hvalle
New Head-Fier
I have been using the player for several days now and can already draw some conclusions. I will compare it with Hiby R3 II, which is a direct competitor, since it has approximately the same size and weight. Although now Hiby is noticeably cheaper (about $ 160), but at the start it cost about the same - about $ 200. My review of Hiby R3 II can be read here: https://www.head-fi.org/threads/hiby-r3-pro-portable-bluetooth-dap.916299/post-17846074
I will start with the pros.
1. The firmware is MUCH more stable, faster and more convenient. Over the past six months, I have been pretty fed up with Hiby R3 II, which constantly freezes for no reason and stops responding. Shanling M1 Plus has NEVER frozen since the moment of purchase, it works flawlessly in this regard. I have already scolded Hiby for the fact that their firmware is getting worse and worse with each version. This applies not only to performance, but also to functionality and convenience. In Hiby R3 II, the brightness can only be changed through the settings, and it is not in the curtain, and to get to the settings, you need to make at least 10 swipes from right to left. This is complete nonsense, isn't it? Shanling took both problems into account - the brightness is adjusted in the curtain, you can get to the settings by pressing one button in the same curtain, and you can always return to the track by pressing one button. In M1 Pro, everything is at hand and easily accessible.
2. The screen is much brighter and does not blind in the sun.
3. Winter has not yet arrived and I have not yet had the opportunity to test the touchscreen in the cold, but at least the touchscreen works with gloves - this is a big plus for use in winter. In Hiby R3 II, the touchscreen does not react to static electricity, but to heat, so it only works with bare hands and only in the warm season.
4. Sound is a matter of taste, but Hiby R3 II made me hate many of my headphones. The reason is that it has a noticeable V-shaped frequency response with a significant dip in the center and strongly protruding lows and highs. And therefore ANY headphones connected to Hiby R3 II began to sound the same. Shanling M1 Plus, according to first impressions and comparisons, has a more neutral sound. Right after Hiby R3 II, Shanling M1 Plus seems like there is no bass at all, although this is not true. And this allowed me to happily return to some headphones that I liked before Hiby R3 II.
5. Good battery life. I can’t clearly and accurately compare with Hiby, but it feels at least no worse.
Of the shortcomings, I can only highlight this:
1. Although the width, length and weight are similar to Hiby R3 II, the player is noticeably thicker. In addition, due to the sharp edges, it is impossible to use it without a case. A case is another plus to the cost, additional weight and additional thickness.
But I will write a separate post about some software failures that I encountered.
I will start with the pros.
1. The firmware is MUCH more stable, faster and more convenient. Over the past six months, I have been pretty fed up with Hiby R3 II, which constantly freezes for no reason and stops responding. Shanling M1 Plus has NEVER frozen since the moment of purchase, it works flawlessly in this regard. I have already scolded Hiby for the fact that their firmware is getting worse and worse with each version. This applies not only to performance, but also to functionality and convenience. In Hiby R3 II, the brightness can only be changed through the settings, and it is not in the curtain, and to get to the settings, you need to make at least 10 swipes from right to left. This is complete nonsense, isn't it? Shanling took both problems into account - the brightness is adjusted in the curtain, you can get to the settings by pressing one button in the same curtain, and you can always return to the track by pressing one button. In M1 Pro, everything is at hand and easily accessible.
2. The screen is much brighter and does not blind in the sun.
3. Winter has not yet arrived and I have not yet had the opportunity to test the touchscreen in the cold, but at least the touchscreen works with gloves - this is a big plus for use in winter. In Hiby R3 II, the touchscreen does not react to static electricity, but to heat, so it only works with bare hands and only in the warm season.
4. Sound is a matter of taste, but Hiby R3 II made me hate many of my headphones. The reason is that it has a noticeable V-shaped frequency response with a significant dip in the center and strongly protruding lows and highs. And therefore ANY headphones connected to Hiby R3 II began to sound the same. Shanling M1 Plus, according to first impressions and comparisons, has a more neutral sound. Right after Hiby R3 II, Shanling M1 Plus seems like there is no bass at all, although this is not true. And this allowed me to happily return to some headphones that I liked before Hiby R3 II.
5. Good battery life. I can’t clearly and accurately compare with Hiby, but it feels at least no worse.
Of the shortcomings, I can only highlight this:
1. Although the width, length and weight are similar to Hiby R3 II, the player is noticeably thicker. In addition, due to the sharp edges, it is impossible to use it without a case. A case is another plus to the cost, additional weight and additional thickness.
But I will write a separate post about some software failures that I encountered.