Standard is probably the best - don't use the GTO, bit-perfect might be ok in some systems.
Right, I never really got a long enough impression/dial on 'standard' filter and thought just to keep it purist 'bitperfect' but if it lessens the "rounding of the edges of instruments" as I perceive it, it would be great and should get my unit tomorrow...the Neo2 is a real ninja unit - so so lively/vivid...yet smooth - it's almost a contradictory presentation...I don't see anything close to what it has to offer under $900...anyone know anything better ?
It almost has the vividness and timing/attack of Hugo 2 to my ears at less than half its retail....looking forward to its pairing with Kennerton Thror which is supposed to be at Susvara tier ability - in its own way.
EDIT : Got my Neo 2 again this morning and yes, to my ears it is most like
Qutest/Hugo2....
Kills HifiMAN Serenade DACamp on dynamics/vividness...IMO.
With standard filter setting vs bitperfect - I'm no longer feeling the "rounding of edges" is only way to describe it.
I'd love to test it next to a
Hugo TT2...(£3500 retail)..even if it gets to
80-90% of TT2 - what an amazing price/performance ratio.
Weirdly Chord is - of course -
proprietary FPGA tech and this is
Burr-Brown multibit but they somehow converge on a super similar sound to my ears and the Neo 2 - from independent power output tests - is, I think, around 2.5 watts per channel sustained output (not shortburst output 5.5 watts as is shown on the retail box exterior)