Here to report that this combo works like a charm:
Sony NWZ-A15 (or A16 / A17) + WMC-NWH10 (OTG cable) + iDSD micro.
iDSD nano will work as well.
Get that filter switch away from the "standard" setting! :rolleyes:
Here to report that this combo works like a charm:
Sony NWZ-A15 (or A16 / A17) + WMC-NWH10 (OTG cable) + iDSD micro.
iDSD nano will work as well.
I am awaiting my Forza custom digital cable, should arrive in the next day or so hopefully, as it shipped on the 5th. http://forzaaudioworks.com/en/product.php?id_product=30
I plug into the 3.5mm socket on my DX90 and use the RCA Intelligent SPDIF® Coaxial jack on the back of the iDSD Micro. (Port next to the RCA LEFT AND RIGHT)
Used the left channel of a straight RCA audio cable with an RCA to 3.5mm adapter tip in the mean time. Works, but I expect the custom cable to be more efficient, if not just more convenient since it doesn't have the extra bulk of being too long, and a useless right channel RCA cable that all has to be wrapped-up together. Best bet is if you can find a straight composite video RCA cable and drop the adapter on it until you get a custom cable. (Or make-do with it if it is short enough.)
Hope this helps!
Ken N.
Hi guys,
Would like to seek opinions on which setup will yield better results. Currently using first setup.
iusbpower -> idsd micro -> hd800
iusbpower -> idsd micro -> micro ican -> hd800
Thanks.
The Micro iCAN is said to be a better amp than the Micro iDSD's amp section though I bet there are other desktop amps that would do even better for something like an HD800.
iDAC? IDAC would improve the micro iDSD?Question: if iPurifyer is already built-in to the iDSD Micro, then why would you need the iUSB Power unit? Just plug the iDSD Micro into your USB port, and it cleans up the USB 2 or USB 3 port noise handily. (At least compared to the noise that gets through my FIIO e17 USB connection in my setup, it does!)
As far as power needed to drive the HD-800, unless someone who owns one AND a HD-650, both broken-in well, can confirm otherwise, I'd be inclined to believe that the HD-800 isn't any harder to drive than the HD-650. And the iDSD Micro puts out plenty of power to make the HD-650s sound great to my ears. MUCH better than the FIIO e17 or even my old full-sized Panasonic surround sound home theater's "headphone out". The SCHIIT ASGARD 2 does beat it in terms of raw power, but both can be driven to volume levels uncomfortable for listening, so much-so that the advantage of portability trumps the minor difference many times over for me.
Nothing to stop you from buying an iCan if you want to try it, but I recommend you obtain it from a source that allows returns without restocking fees... I truly don't believe it will be a "value-add" over your iDSD Micro by itself.
Suggestion: A good, desktop amp with oodles of power that has been reviewed as sounding great with the HD-800 would be where I'd spend that extra money. Use the costs you'd save on the iUSB Power, (If you can still return it.) and iDAC to get you started.
Just my 2 cents. If you DO decide to try them both anyway, please let me know if you disagree with my impressions. It's all about sharing and experimenting after all!
(My personal budget just isn't great enough to try everything unless I can be reasonably sure based on others' impressions that a purchase makes clear sound quality improvement sense. "Buy once by buying-right rather than buying-cheap" is my motto. To date, I've not read anything that shows as a better value for sound quality, file support, features, or raw power in the iDSD's price range or even double. And that includes both portable and non-portable solutions.)
Most of all, ENJOY THE MUSIC!
Ken N.
Wow. That is quite a statement. Goes to show how great the micro iDSD is.Got to hear Chord Hugo today head-to-head against iDSD micro. Can't say I find Hugo to be any better sound. Both are excellent DAC/amp but Hugo has a very obvious warmish / richer tone. One thing I dislike about Hugo is that it is a very user-unfriendly design, with almost no marking on the casing to tell you which does what, not to mention the design is rather ugly. Chord should have more paid attention to the little detail consider how expensive Hugo is. It is like someone's unfinished project.
Got to hear Chord Hugo today head-to-head against iDSD micro. Can't say I find Hugo to be any better sound. Both are excellent DAC/amp but Hugo has a very obvious warmish / richer tone. One thing I dislike about Hugo is that it is a very user-unfriendly design, with almost no marking on the casing to tell you which does what, not to mention the design is rather ugly. Chord should have more paid attention to the little detail consider how expensive Hugo is. It is like someone's unfinished project.
Very similar to one of my buddy's impression on both of them but the Chord Hugo seem to perform noticeably better than the Micro iDSD with certain headphones he said.
Close to another $2000 for some magic mumbo jumbo… it must be depressing to realize your phones are those that perform similarly on both after already buying the Hugo.
Very similar to one of my buddy's impression on both of them but the Chord Hugo seem to perform noticeably better than the Micro iDSD with certain headphones he said.