castleofargh
Sound Science Forum Moderator
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2011
- Posts
- 10,452
- Likes
- 6,079
Keep in mind that those graphs may or may not be average graphs from many measurements. As the intent on those is clearly to show the bass variation of the XR model, they might not have bothered with a statistical analysis over hundreds of pairs. So for all I know, 3 pairs of ER2 could show graphs with more variations between them than what we're seeing here against ER3 and 4. Or maybe not, my point is that we're not sure until we get many measurements or more information from the very people who did those 3 graphs.
Official ER2, ER3, and ER4 graphs. The ER2 is the brightest of them all unfortunately. ER3 has the most correct 9K-16K tuning in my opinion but has even more subdued 5-8K than the ER4 which makes it more muddy.
Also be really careful before drawing universal conclusions about high frequency(be it on measurements or subjective experience). Because the tiniest change in insertion can easily cause the type of differences seen in those graphs. Here the treble of the er2 could hypothetically come from an er3 or 4 except that the 9 or 10kHz resonance has been shifted above by a different insertion and is now adding up to another bump past 10kHz? Or maybe those graphs do show the typical differences with the exact same insertion. Again I don't know enough to totally reject either possibility. maybe all you said is generally accurate. I'm only suggesting caution when trying to interpret those graphs.