- Joined
- Jun 4, 2014
- Posts
- 3,652
- Likes
- 2,927
Some thoughts on, and measurements of, the new ER2XR...
1) Very cool to hear an Etymotic with sub-bass The ER2XR definitely has the Ety signature, but it has a little more bass and a tiny little bit less treble than the ER4XR. This is the case with all eartips I've listened and measured with (note I've not measured with the default Ety triple-flange tips, simply because I find them too uncomfortable to use):
Some comments on these eartips. 1) Foam always rolls off the treble. 2) My SpinFit Cp800 medium tips are a little more bulbous than the Ety triple flanges, so insertion depth ends up being shallower. 3) Comply Ts100 foam tips roll really small, so they allow deeper insertion (hence the northwards shift in the resonance peak). To my ears, these peaks end up ~ 10 kHz.
2) Channel matching. It's actually very good, at least it is in the pair I received (note that all other measurements here are averages of L and R measurements):
This is quite comparable with the channel balance in my ER4XR:
3)My THD measurements look to be superficially similar to those of @JohnYang1997's ER2SE. They look to be lower than those of the ER4XR, but that's a little bit of a trick of the log scale. Things actually reverse (slightly) after about 6 kHz:
3) There's maybe fractionally more high-frequency damping, but otherwise no significant differences in impulse response:
In summary, there's a lot to love about the ER2XR and it's hard to go wrong for the price. I've not tried to measure isolation yet, but there are no external vents and that all-important isolation seems to be every bit as good as we've come to expect from an Ety. Nice job Etymotic!
I'm not going to declare a winner or give anything marks out of 10, because it's all going to come down to personal preference. The ER2XR has notably more low-end than the ER4XR (which itself, already has more low-end than the ER4SR). That alone will tend to give the headphone's sound a warmer tilt, because the upper register is going to contribute proportionally less of the overall energy. But the ER2XR also has just a tiny little bit less of the lower treble too (when normalised at 1 kHz). When switching back and forth, the ER2XR can seem a tiny bit veiled in comparison to the ER4XR. Or, conversely, the ER4XR can feel slightly lacking in low end thump when listening to bass-heavy tracks. If you prefer a warmer, bassier sound, I'd recommend the ER2XR. If you want that detail in the upper register, to my ears it's more apparent with the ER4XR.
Overall, a nice headphone. Impressive to see what can be done with a single driver
P.S. Measurements are raw/uncompensated via 711-compliant coupler.
1) Very cool to hear an Etymotic with sub-bass The ER2XR definitely has the Ety signature, but it has a little more bass and a tiny little bit less treble than the ER4XR. This is the case with all eartips I've listened and measured with (note I've not measured with the default Ety triple-flange tips, simply because I find them too uncomfortable to use):
Some comments on these eartips. 1) Foam always rolls off the treble. 2) My SpinFit Cp800 medium tips are a little more bulbous than the Ety triple flanges, so insertion depth ends up being shallower. 3) Comply Ts100 foam tips roll really small, so they allow deeper insertion (hence the northwards shift in the resonance peak). To my ears, these peaks end up ~ 10 kHz.
2) Channel matching. It's actually very good, at least it is in the pair I received (note that all other measurements here are averages of L and R measurements):
This is quite comparable with the channel balance in my ER4XR:
3)My THD measurements look to be superficially similar to those of @JohnYang1997's ER2SE. They look to be lower than those of the ER4XR, but that's a little bit of a trick of the log scale. Things actually reverse (slightly) after about 6 kHz:
3) There's maybe fractionally more high-frequency damping, but otherwise no significant differences in impulse response:
In summary, there's a lot to love about the ER2XR and it's hard to go wrong for the price. I've not tried to measure isolation yet, but there are no external vents and that all-important isolation seems to be every bit as good as we've come to expect from an Ety. Nice job Etymotic!
I'm not going to declare a winner or give anything marks out of 10, because it's all going to come down to personal preference. The ER2XR has notably more low-end than the ER4XR (which itself, already has more low-end than the ER4SR). That alone will tend to give the headphone's sound a warmer tilt, because the upper register is going to contribute proportionally less of the overall energy. But the ER2XR also has just a tiny little bit less of the lower treble too (when normalised at 1 kHz). When switching back and forth, the ER2XR can seem a tiny bit veiled in comparison to the ER4XR. Or, conversely, the ER4XR can feel slightly lacking in low end thump when listening to bass-heavy tracks. If you prefer a warmer, bassier sound, I'd recommend the ER2XR. If you want that detail in the upper register, to my ears it's more apparent with the ER4XR.
Overall, a nice headphone. Impressive to see what can be done with a single driver
P.S. Measurements are raw/uncompensated via 711-compliant coupler.
Last edited: