marcmccalmont
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
- Posts
- 526
- Likes
- 209
A while ago when I tried to wrap my head around ferrites I called Fair Rite and had a discussion with an application engineer. Here is the summary: the materials permeability can be changed to target different frequencies. By splitting a ferrite core you increase the q of its filter characteristics and push its peak frequency higher. Ferrites are most effective if they are tight fitting and the more surface area that is in contact with the shield increases the effectiveness. Some have stated the split in a snap on might make a lens for rf to migrate out.Can you explain the differences between the two kinds of ferrites and why one improves things but the other makes them worse, or is it that this is just what you’ve found?
My personal experience is between Blu2 and Dave I used 16 clip on high frequency ferrites which was very effective. Directly into Dave from a source I’ve found using both lf and hf non split core ferrites that are long with more surface area to be very effective. I don’t have an HMS yet so I can’t comment on what works best there but I’ll try lf ferrites that are not split core since the hf rf issue has been addressed internally