AndrewOld
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Posts
- 1,048
- Likes
- 978
But the DAVE is not an arbitrary upstream product from a different manufacturer. Chord make and Rob designed both the M Scaler and the DAVE so it is reasonable to expect them to specify, indeed arguably even supply, an optimum way of connecting them. How else were all the critical listening tests and design work conducted? When the Blu2 came out, there was an issue with RF to which Rob suggested a solution involving very modestly priced clip-on ferrites. No problem with that. Identify a problem, fix it. But then the M Scaler came out and instead of the problem being truly sorted, which we were initially told it was, we were then told by Rob that cheap, readily available, clip-on ferrites were no longer effective, and we now needed £1400 cables to fix the same problem. So instead of designing out a problem, he designed in a worse one, in that the solution got many, many times more expensive.This is unrealistic for two reasons:
1) No manufacturer can account for all external issues (connections, power, placement, upstream and downstream equipment, the room - can you imagine speaker makers being held to this standard?
2) Whatever manufacturers do so to solve potential issues (like Rob with the power supply) people will go to crazy lengths to modify it in an attempt to improve it and swear up and down it’s better…until the next mod or tweak or new component.
So, everyone has to draw their own line toward audio nervosa with their own ears, budget and use cases.![]()
And when challenged, Rob said that
£1400 is just the price of a good bottle of wine
which I found insulting and condescending, given that he got his own cables free. So if the new M Scaler does not come with an optimum way of connecting it to the DAVE I shall keep my kidneys and buy many, many bottles of wine. And many, many concert tickets.
Last edited: