Receiving my hek v2 tomorrow so new to this forum
Used the mojo with hex sounded great
I had heard mojo needed an amp for hek aren't these forums for helping people
Sorry you're so bored
tuna, don't worry about the amp! I'm sure the HE1000 V2 will sound great driven by the Mojo as well, even better than the HEX. And if that's not the case, you can still make for reenforcement.
As an encouragement, the mention that
Chord use Audeze LCD-4 for demoing the new Hugo² at shows. The Hugo² has 28% more power than the Hugo¹, 740 compared to 580 watts, at 33 Ω, and from all I know the Mojo has about the same output power as the Hugo¹ (see
figures). Compared to the HE1000 the LCD-4 has extremely low sensitivity and is said (around here) to need a really powerful headphone amp or even better a speaker amp. Now Chord would be ill-advised to use it for demoing the Hugo² if it couldn't properly drive it. I have auditioned the LCD-4 myself using my Hugo, and it sounded fine up to the levels my ears could bear.
I'm not commenting on the correctness of your observations on HEK and Mojo or Dave, or other Chord gear. I've heard them at meets, but not in a familiar environment where I can assess the relative performance with and without an amp. I use my MicroZOTL2 (which I really like) with the Line Out Option of a Geek Out SE, or with a turntable/phono pre-amp (am I double amping my vinyl output? I suppose I am, but it is necessary in analog LP listening). And I think we get the point you make. And also that some disagree. And the back and forth doesn't accomplish anything after the point is made (I've never seen, say, a cable disbeliever become convinced by something someone wrote. It only happens when one hears it for themselves. And if they don't hear it, no amount of verbiage will convince them they are wrong). So I'm not taking a position on your position (from the department of redundant redundancy). I'd love to own a Dave to be able to weigh in from personal experience. The point is, we get it...
The thing is, my proposals are always treated as not worth considering. I've never read something like: «Oh well, that's something I could try if I have the time» or: «I must confess that I don't have the patience for this kind of effort equalizing brings with it» or «I'm just too lazy and don't need the last bit of resolution and accuracy anyway». Instead the re-amping approach is displayed as the only valid one – from its supporters –, and this despite Rob Watts' clear speach. Right now my attempt to let
tuna47 know my personal experience with the corresponding recommendation to better renounce an amp is downright sabotaged by trying to ridicule me.
I just chime in in cases like this, when again the unjustified amplifier glorification is about to mislead a new Head-Fier towards spending money for useless gear.