I was expecting the worst: bright and thin bass, etc. To my surprise, I did not notice any sacrifice in the bass response at all. In fact I experienced a fuller and smoother overall sound. It could be due to going from the stock SE cable to balanced. This is my first foray into non-stock cables and I'm not disappointed so far.
Silver cable is the best and has been confused with silver plated which is hard to get right.
It is most silver plated copper that has that brightness/harshness Problem.
Norne Vanquish Cable found a way to use this uneven perception to its advantage by making a lively cable,
But for sensitive cans like HD800 you can still hear fatigue or confusion of ambient cues depth in the treble presence range.
Especially with many DACs .
I like my "ELA Audio" pure silver Ultimate version:
It is twice the thickness of the regular version,
And it didn't cost an arm and a leg because it is solid core silver, instead of softer teeny hairline thin stranded silver used by others...
How much did it costs?
It was in the $350 US range, which is extremely cheap for silver cable,
Mainly because of not using the fancy stranded variety, being solid core,
But using many conductors braided ALmost like a druag2 cable.
Thanks. I do really like the Norne on my Audeze (a Draug 2). The MIT is new to me, so thanks, I'll investigate.
The Draug2 (OCC copper) I also still own
but find the top end artificially airy compared to my silver cable which has more solid image and Lazer sharp focus.
Still, the Draug2 is an excellent cable over normal cables and any silver plated type.
Actually yes I had precisely the same impression of the V1, and the V2 surprised me because it is noticeably more liquid and full, especially in vocals. And it is more soothing and sweet and musical overall for someone like me who is super-sensitive to shrill highs. And the bass is bigger/better too and better integrated.
You're not helping me and my wallet
Although that's good to hear, anyone else with thoughts on V1 vs V2, and also V2 vs Utopia.
Thanks
The Utilopia compared to the HEKV2 is outclassed by the HEKV2 more elegant refined matured sound.
Utopia is more forward focused .
Therfore It does not do all genres like the HEKV2.
It is a great secondary can, NOT a TOTAL genre can.
It relies upon the beauty of tube gear to sound it's best and make up for certain deficiencies.
It does not have the HEK Soundstage, and all that implies, like holography and imaging.
It does not have the HEK bass depth and oomph..
It gets you 75% there, with added benifit of great mids.
Utopia is not the better can to me.
I prefer the ZMF Eikon over the Utopia for a secondary can to compliment the HEKV2 or HD800.
You be surprised to see how the ZMF stacks up ...
Utopia is a rigid, high xmax driver. It's also a bit faster sounding than the HE1000. You can see in the impulse response the Utopia driver starts and stops very quickly whereas the HE1000 driver keeps moving well after the initial signal, which causes some sounds like the treble to hang in the air a bit longer, making it sound a bit slower in treble response.
Actually what you describe would give you more decay on HEK, not a "slower" response.
This impart a body and flesh to sound.
An opposite example is the HD800 being percieved as too "fast" , so thin in bass, when clearly the HD800 does produce good bass in freq response charts.