StanD
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Posts
- 9,002
- Likes
- 1,134
@StanD
If I might chime in on the previous discussion since I was responded to a few pages back but have been busy. My experience with the Asgard is that it was very flat and lifeless in comparison to my current setup and many other evolutions. I actually found that my little dot mk2 amp, an amp that nobody would recommend for the HE-500 sounded better to my ears than the asgard after living with both for a very extended period. That was when I was new to audio and thought that there is no way the asgard could be worse than my little dot. Now the little dot is not that great of an amp(compared to all HP amps in the world), but I found it very interesting that I preferred the sound over a 100 something mw amp over the ~1W of the asgard. The bifrost was my source at that time.
It's at that point I realized what my friend hifimanrookie is trying to point out(which you ignored), that the spec sheet doesn't really tell you the whole story. I wouldn't really say that the asgard sounds bad and I'm not really trying to discredit it, it's fine for the money but it really doesn't do the HE-500 justice(my original point).
It seems strange to me that you've said to have spent a lot of time with really high end amplifiers and did not think much of them other than a fancy case. Your conclusion was the asgard was just as good as any amp out there? Not sure many, or any audio enthusiasts will agree with you on that one.
All of the things you state, FR, Power, whatever really doesn't tell the story of how an amplifier sounds. If power was the whole story we wouldn't have such a wide array of voicings that all these boutique manufacturers offer. We would have one design and that would be it.
But that isn't the whole story. The specs can give us some valuable information and the asgard provides adequate power, when people talk about quality power, it's really about having enough power and whatever it is audio designers do to have such amazing transperancy(something graphs aren't going to tell you) in their product.
So the general rule for anyone I would be advising would be this. Good sound first, and then worry about having enough power. All power and no transperancy really the power is not going to do anything. Am I wrong on this? I'll restate that if it was as simple as supplying enough power then why do super cheap amplifiers that have ridiculous power sound so bad?
I'm applying this to people shopping in the under $1k usd range as once you get around that price it's much easier to find the power and quality design all in one place. I think the lyr is a great buy and does much more justice to the he-500 than the asgard to be sure.
A lot of people who own and use the Asgard 2 will disagree with you as to your claims of that amp. As far as quality power, 100 mW cannot drive an HE-500 past a 109 dB peak without gobs of distortion, that is certainly not quality. That Little Dot MKII at 100 mW at 32 Ohms is not going to be able deliver on an HE-500 no matter how much you or HiFi (yes you gave it a +1) wish it to. That amp is designed for and works for higher impedance cans. How you can make this claim, makes no sense to me. If pairing this pleases you and that's what you want, go for it. I'll pass on this choice. If on the other hand you desire a boutique amp, that's cool.
The Asgard 2 is not one of those cheap amps you try to make some odd point about. You might try using an A/B switch to do proper comparisons, it can be an enlightening experience.