Whats the general consensus when it comes to comparing the akg712pro & the hd600/650 is the he-400i considered an upgrade or more of its own signature? Could you own all 3?
FWIW, using Schiit Magni+modi, have the Q701 and the 400i, and the main thing for me is that 400i is a good step above in terms of detail/resolution/clarity. I'd say that overall the q701 are very good headphones, and they can stand up in some ways vs 400i, but if you had a ladder of high fidelity, the 400i would definitely be higher IMHO just for the resolution, definitely a significant step up. Otherwise, they are indeed different sounding, so preference might be a toss up, sometimes some things like better resolution isn't even a strength depending on some material...
Both have their own sound (frequency response), 400i maybe a tad more mid/treble oriented, with Q701 bit darker with more (lower quality) bass, I'd say maybe the Q701 wins high/mid/bass balance, but when you're taking such a step back in terms of resolution, it's a bit like a mountain bike vs light bike with slim tires... Rolling fine pavement it's a no brainer, race bike is very smooth & fast, but given many roads are in crap condition (not great recordings), mountain bike might make a better ride; slower, but much less bumpy, but way less maneuverable, way slower & heavier... Different beasts.
Only heard the 650 once on a Senn amp which I was told
wasn't a good match, and I was not impressed, very dark sounding and detail/resolution wasn't great, way more reminiscent of q701 than 400i... HD700 & 800 sounded much better on that setup, with way more acceptable detail; (was under the impression the 400i resolution was closer to those, but, as I said, some have said the amp wasn't a good match for 650, some said even 650 was similar in detail, ymmv..)