Thank you, Joe. That is correct.Well he said they have different timbre, which is different from saying they are superior
I inferred nothing of the sort. Please re-read: "All 3 of those DAPs have different takes on timbre and what you prefer will be up to your ears and how they match with your headphones."Saying one thing and inferring another
I stand corrected, and fully agree with you about the tonality settings. I use 'warm' myself.
Thank you. One super benefit is that they apply globally, not just inside a music player app!
Thank you. One super benefit is that they apply globally, not just inside a music player app!
Still hoping @Joe Bloggs can tell us how they work, from a technical perspective
Thanks. I'll still place them at the top of my "to-buy" list, since available options are scarce. There's one from Miter... and there's one from Hiby themselves. The Miter case is thin, and doesn't exude a sense of quality. The same can be said for Hiby's stock leather case. If I do get them, I'll let you know.
I just upgraded from an M11 to an R6 Pro. No issues and no complaints. Prefer the form factor, and the stainless steel build quality is premium. The RF noise issues are real, but only If you leave your phone on top of the player. Google Play out the box and easy UAPP integration (including native DSD playback) would be two advantages I'd flag over the DX160. At this level you can't really go wrong with either player - both offering sound and features that simply weren't available for less than $1000 a year ago.
I don't think it's possible on a device that doesn't support it to start with without great standy battery drain, but I can ask.
Would greatly appreciate that, thanks. And any update on the request for hardware MQA support on the R6 Pro? Those two features alone would make the R6 Pro unbeatable value in this market.
Hi havenglory,
Yes, but the point about new circuits ("wiring pattern") is comparing with the original R6, not old R6pro's.
Joe
