Arnotts
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 15, 2011
- Posts
- 365
- Likes
- 104
Arnotts do you thing the h10 is good enaugh with hd 800?
I have only ever heard the HD800 from the Matrix M-Stage stack as well as the Gustard U12 + X12 + H10 stack. It's unfortunate, as it means that I don't have many points of reference to hear exactly what the HD800's are capable of sounding like. Having said that, though, I have no interest in trying other amps/DACs along with the HD800's - the sound I hear from the Gustard stack results in both the HD800's and LCD-X's being in the same league.
My experience with both headphones are echoed pretty strongly in this post: http://www.head-fi.org/t/609155/toxic-cables-impressions-and-discussion-thread/5580#post_10119891
I don't find treble detail to be necessarily "lacking" in the LCD-X's - it sounds smoother and more natural to me. The HD800's have MORE treble extension and detail, giving it a brighter and hyper-detailed kind of sound that does not sound as natural to me. The Gustard stack helps reveal the details, but also prevents it from becoming too detailed/bright so that most recordings become unlistenable - it still has a nice, smooth quality to it. Bass is tight, but lacks accurate presence; it feels a little recessed compared to the X's, which makes it lack some punch and excitement.
The HD800's are a very useful tool as a microscope for the music. I can hear details laid out across a large, spacious, airy soundstage (which in turn makes it even easier to hear these subtle details) in songs, which sometimes isn't the best for pleasure listening, but it's certainly useful when trying to learn how certain producers construct their tracks.
As far as I can tell, the H10 drives the HD800's excellently. The SubPac S2 also helps alleviate the issue of the lack of bass presence for me.