I'm a little weird about logos - partially in that for companies like Nike or other brands, we've somehow been duped into playing a "keeping up with the Joneses" game of representation/free advertising (we've bought in hook, line, and sinker that the brands we associate with are WHO we are - e.g. Apple, Beats, SoulCycle, Adidas etc) I have started to resent this as a situation where individuals are voluntarily providing free advertising, often to companies that they only like because they think they should or they cost a good amount. I know I tend to overestimate the degree to which this is actually exploitative (people aren't really being hurt per se), but I do view it as something that's just a little backward in modern culture. Personally, the brands that appeal to me the most are those that make quality products and don't label or do big graphics etc. For example, although they are pricey and bougie, I like Outlier's pants - they form the foundation of my minimalist wardrobe.
Now, the Klipsch earbuds in particular - I'm not opposed to a company including an identifying/recognizable symbol on TW earbuds - in some cases, a little design logo can add to the aesthetic. My issue with the Klipsch one is that, subjectively, I think they look large and boxy and that is exacerbated by what I consider to be one of the most garishly unattractive logos I've seen on an electronic. In addition, the logo writing appears to be gold contrasting with black - and despite being from Steeler country - not my cup of tea and makes the garish logo *pop* that much more.
If the audio quality was there for the price..... I'd maaaybe think about it. But otherwise, the logo, it's prominence, and the size of these earbuds means that I may be unfairly not giving them a chance.