Quote:
oh i get it your talking about those crappy old wolfson dac's, ROFL, my old dvd player from years ago has the same dac the s:flo2 has, guess what, it cost me all of 20USD years ago......yeah thats audiophile quality hardware there.....ROFL bloody idiots
and the LO is useless if you dont want to use an amp or LOD to make the thing not sound like crap, oh wait, you like it to sound "warm"(see louder is better)
and why should you NEED an amp to make a player not suck? sorry but if you NEED an amp for low impedance IEM's or HP's then your "DoingItWrong".
and thank god your gonna put me on ignore, idiots like you who recommend overpriced CRAP really should just do the world a favor and drink some draino, or pour it in your ears, that may help remove the wax buildup so you can hear What your listening to without it being LOUD AS HELL.
The s:flo2 sounds better than the Clip+ and Fuze players. End of story. It's a better player and YES: I have both and I have A/Bed them both flat WITH amplication. Volume set the same (noise coming to my ears) and the s:flo2 just sounds better. More detail, the music sounds FULLER. Not louder as you stated earlier.
The soundstage is noticeably better than the Clip+ as well.
The update fixed the HO of the T51 BTW; it sounds better than before although i only use the LO.
Oh and BTW, the equipment I use is the Clip/T51 // iBasso PB1 // K702 Blue-Dragon cabled. Please don't come to this site and expect to know everything. You have a long way to go before you can amass some amount of knowledge to hold a decent debate against someone else. Bashing another poster because they have a different opinion than you do isn't the way to do things around here.
Quote:
I've had the clip+ and fuze and they both sound exactly the same to my ears and I still have the clip+ and sold the fuze. They also had similar driving power.
I consider my clip+ a very good value. It is pretty flat and I believe the graphs match what I am hearing. However I would not really consider it a great player. It does have flat frequency but there are some things that it lacks. Driving power could be an issue depending on what you use as well as volume. I only mostly dynamic driver earphones and it does have a slight issue with driving power. I can get it to volumes I would not listen to but that is not driving capabilities. The navigation sucks and so does pretty much the rest of the OF. it can be rockboxed however which is a good thing since I hate the OF and there's no way I would buy a sansa player otherwise. I waited until rockbox supported the clip+ to purchase it. It is cheap however and has decent sound. I've heard better players and I've heard worse. I wouldn't rank it at the top but not the bottom. It's in the middle of the pack.
Lastly I think Anaxilus knows what he is talking about
He does own a clip+ and/or fuze if I'm not mistaken.
1. Yep. Lots of people say they sound exactly the same. I went for the Clip+ because it was smaller and easier to use in the car. I didn't have to look at the player; just picked it up out of the cup holder, pushed a button, and threw it back.
2. I agree with pretty much the whole second paragraph. The player is very flat and I loved classical music the most with it; probably because it lacked "power" which is somewhat similar to what you're saying (and correct me if I'm wrong, don't want to put words in your mouth or anything). I used my T51 HO for everything else (before) the update because it just gave every genre more body/soul. After the update (and when amping) I just go for the T51.
3. Rockbox is great for the player. I never went through the trouble of doing it mainly because I just EQed the bass and treble up for rap/rock/hardcore etc. music in the car.
4.Anaxilus does know what he's talking about. I've read a lot of his posts over a long period of time and although I don't know if i agreed with everything he said, he always backed up his opinions with strong points and didn't just rant/rave about why he was "right" and bash others like AzureSky seems to be doing here.