I went down the special edition white version rabbit hole already and it seems like they have less bass.
I don’t know that I’m a bass head. Maybe I’m in denial
I don’t know that I’m a bass head. Maybe I’m in denial
Just comes down to tuning. Same driver in both...Fostex just changed a few things I guess between the damping in the red versus the special edition colors.I went down the special edition white version rabbit hole already and it seems like they have less bass.
I don’t know that I’m a bass head. Maybe I’m in denial
I have never tried them stock, but my modified versions (white TH900s) are just about perfect and have become a favorite.
Can drive these from most anything and they sound great.
What treble spike!?!?
I did not do the mods, so do not know all the minor details, of which I know their are many. I am not sure what wood the Pearl white cups use, but that is what I currently have installed. I am waiting for some new wood cups that i can swap on at some point in the future.Both the modded and original plots look excellent. Any chance for a CSD, impulse, distortion and spectrogram?
The modded one looks like endgame (if the driver is the same as with the Urushi version) - and if the bass doesn't mask the mids. I would probably take a middle ground between the mod and the original. My modded D7200 plot looks very much like this, but the TH900 driver is better than the one in the D7200.
I am curious what causes the change, what wood are the cups made of, do the headphones have a different damper (foam ring), different loading (holes in the back of the driver and driver plate), front metallic grill, ear pads etc.
FWIW I am intend to keep my modded Urushi TH900 for its bass impact and my modded D9200 for most music genres. After a few years my TH900 settled well, no issue in the treble.
But I never thought a TH900 plot can look this good.
I think i might try this! Thanks for the tip.I would not bother changing the cups. This is the best measuring Fostex family member that I've ever seen, including new and old Denons, and my mods (except perhaps the D7200). Well, better measurements don't always mean better sound (I remember the well measuring but comparatively dead sounding Ebony cups). IME the light wood cups sounded more musical (Urushi, bamboo, cedar, etc). Just be happy with the Pearls and don't look back. And don't be tempted by the other Fostex family members, either.
Compared to these everything else might sound flat, except the best e-stats and some planars. The D9200 has better bass structure, definition and layering, at similar resolution, but less impact (yet more sub-bass impact, with my mods). Somehow the TH900 sounds fuller and more colorful in the bass, preferable with many genres to the dryer, more reference-level D9200. Like a tube amp (cj or ARC) vs a Krell or Spectral. Voices, wind instruments, piano, violins are better on the D9200, though, than on my own TH900. Yours seem to have no issues there (but I'd need to see the impulse response and CSD to form a rough comparison).
A lot of mods BTW, including some very tricky ones (especially the damping ring, I have 50+ damper rings here that I made and tried). I am not using the mounting ring, with every pad it sounded better without them, directly attaching the pads to the housing with double-sided adhesive. Good tip on the earpads, are they original AT or 3rd party (Brainwavz, Wesper, etc)?
One thing I noticed that the cups settled in about 2 years, so I could take out all damping and they measured without ringing. The sound is more clear and more immediate.
IME the less damping and stuffing (with maintaining good measurements), the better. Same applies to the speakers I've built. Of course with headphones you are more constrained for the form factor tes and volume, so it's more of a black art than speakers, but in both cases the "room", i.e. the space between the drivers and ears is the hardest to get right or tune to listenable.
As I get closer to purchasing these puppies, can someone reference a song for me on them?
Ignore the vocals if metal isn’t your thing. What I’m looking for a tight wallop at the guitarsparticularly in the decay/quick stops. It should have the resonance that makes it feel like the walls are shaking. This is most likely between 150 and 200hz peak?
Also, this song is dark (for metal) so you should be able to get the volume up without the treble killing your ears
thanks
Hail, brother of metal. I had a listen. It sounds good, but you can really hear the crappy YouTube compression produce a grainy quality across the spectrum. That said, double bass is slamming and thunderous, but controlled. There's no jiggle here.
I'm a big metalhead myself, though more from the "classic" era, but well produced death metal sounds sweet on the TH900, for example:
Nice choice there. Peak TateThe TH900 can sound great from a good dap with 300MW or 700MW , but you will not vet the TH900s FULL potential from any dap pushing MW. Here I have been testing a few over $1,000 to 3,500 USD daps Vs those daps and cheaper with a 3 to5 Watt amp attached to it. The extra power gives much more dynamics , more depth , more separation , more space from one instrument to the other.
Then they became poppy. Seen them on The Warning Tour.Nice choice there. Peak Tate![]()
I love Rage for Order and obviously Mindcrime, but that they're full of hunger on The Warning. You're lucky to have seen them during that era. I think they were touring with Dio during that album, if I remember correctly.Then they became poppy. Seen them on The Warning Tour.