LCMusicLover
Headphoneus Supremus
I find this post quite surprising.Sorry but I can't find the coherence with :
"Even if we managed to take on defective headphones returns, some units can be left on the market."
How can you manage to take on defective headphones return without knowing the serial numbers ? Just take returns on all potential faulty headphones from the batches concerned and remove them from the second-hand market before faulty ones appears. Those are clearly hidden defects.
"not all headphones from the first batches were affected" tells a lot about FOCAL's manufacturing process and quality checking of finished products. Even the cheap $100-200 Grado cartridges are all individually tested.
There are hand made but the guy who has finished making one don't test it ? At their price, each should be individually tested.
You don't want to give serial numbers because per the US law, "Hidden defects entitle the buyer to demand replacement or cancellation of the contract."
So all concerned by this issue shouldn't ask for guarantee but for replacement.
I don't think FOCAL behaviour is fair with their customer : included in your price is the fact that faulty items have to be replaced, even if there are hundreds of them. That's what audioquest did with an HDMI cable : they found a batch had termination problems (before they put it on the market as they check what they are selling). They cut the terminations, replaced them and as the cables where 0.95-0.98m instead of one meter, they sold it at 40-50% of the retail price. This is the "Mocha" serie, it is 100% similar to coffee HDMI, except the lost of 5cm maximum.
I've been as critical as anyone regarding Focal's warranty policy, but it seems to me that Focal is doing the right thing, and trying to make up for a problem with their product.
You quoted two lines out of Marine's post:
I suspect there's a bit of a language issue here -- I think she's saying that it was impossible for them to catch all the defective sets before they flowed through to retailers and purchasers.Even if we managed to take on defective headphones returns, some units can be left on the market.
You suggest that these all should have been caught in QC prior to shipping. But reports of Utopia driver failures seem to all have happened some time after the customer received them. So they were not 'defective' when shipped or received, and would not have been caught during 'individual testing'.not all headphones from the first batches were affected
In addition, this answers your suggestion that Focal should:
Just take returns on all potential faulty headphones from the batches concerned and remove them from the second-hand market before faulty ones appears. Those are clearly hidden defects.
Finally, your comparison to AudioQuest's problem and how they handled it is specious at best. First, because (as stated above) the Utopia problem was simply not discover-able prior to shipping. Second, because you're talking about products with orders of magnitude difference in price. Also note that cable profit margins dwarf margins for other audio goods percentage-wise. And finally, AudioQuest discovered their problem prior to shipping the product, so they simply pulled the batch and re-worked them. Focal is dealing with a problem with products which are already in the consumers' hands, across the globe.