Even a small win is a win, yes, but there certainly is a sense that the general feeling is now that the price of $3k is more acceptable, and that is not exclusive of the SE6 pricing.
When the Tzar and Fourte were announced there was uproar. Now people are more open to that price point due to other manufacturers noticing that we do still buy at this price en masse and now the ~$3k price is more common, and almost expected of a flagship. This price no longer requires justification - if it's a flagship, that's the price, and we will buy out of lack of willpower/curiosity/loaded af/because we want to.
So nothing new in saying we are to blame but I am not one to celebrate this because they ended up at a price that was already outrageous to begin with, and their attempt at making us think that they lowered the price to something more "acceptable" because they listened to us is pure BS.
My point is that it is painfully obvious that manufacturers know that they can continually keep increasing the price of their flagships and not only will the market respond well to it, but it will reward them. And the frustrating thing is we know this and play along with it. But again that's human nature within and without of this site.
But I guess as I said, this industry is inevitably heading in the direction of 2 channel pricing. I will not participate but that isn't going to stop others from doing so. So I guess...
I don't know him personally nor have I interacted with him but he bluntly stated that he put that price up to test the waters. Without the backlash he would've kept that pricing. With the backlash he still charges an outlandish amount under ridiculous purchasing circumstances. That just seems snake-like to me. He wanted to keep order quantities under control? BS. Just set up a fixed amount of orders per month if that's the case. I don't buy it for a second. That's not lack of communication skills. He is certainly no fool as he can achieve what he does so well. That's still ego and manipulation.