Aug 31, 2008 at 11:09 AM Post #496 of 877
No burn-in is really needed since there is no cap in there, IIRC. I have an old and a new one, and they sound the same.
 
Aug 31, 2008 at 11:15 AM Post #497 of 877
Great, I hate burn in.
biggrin.gif
 
Aug 31, 2008 at 1:43 PM Post #498 of 877
Never noticed burn-in on anything but headphones. This says to me its definitely not me having some paranoid delusion...surely a devout believer would attribute burn-in to everything?

Although, I do turn on my DAC & Amp when I get up. They do get warm during the day, so to my mind they'd perform optimally warm. Isn't this like Electro-static 'phones which require perhaps 30 minutes 'warming-up'.
 
Sep 1, 2008 at 2:57 AM Post #499 of 877
Just got my FiiO in. Am still waiting for my pico which should arrive in a few days. So I'm using this as an amp for my D2>MD5000s. From the D2 it seems to make each instrument especially guitar plucks, drum beats and cymbals a lot clearer at the cost of soundstage and separation. I found that listening unamped on the D2 gave me a much wider soundstage than amped with the FiiO. Turning the D2s volume down does help somewhat but the amp really degrades the soundstage in my experience. Amping my computers onboard sound gave me a lot of motherboard work noise interference. However the amplification effect on the computer was HUGE in comparison to the D2. The volume increase was drastic and it brought back the original bloated bass that the D5000s were modded to get rid of. However the mids are still strong and everything else is brought forward enough to almost compensate for the bloat. Its quite hard to explain. It seems bloated but the Markl mods keep it detailed? I guess thats the easiest way to put it. The extra volume is helpful especially in classic music. I could hear the conductor at the beginning of a symphony where I could not before despite having the PC volume maxed out. With the FiiO and volume at about 1/4 of its max, I could hear the conductor count the orchestra in. The FiiO does make a BIG difference in bass though. Bassheads on a tight budget will love it. I'll be using this till I get my pico. I may give a short review comparison to see how it goes up against arguably the best portable amp available.
 
Sep 1, 2008 at 1:44 PM Post #501 of 877
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonathanjong /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Interesting...I woulda thought the computer would provide more power than a portable, thus reducing the amp's effect.


Me too. I'll have more info for you with more testing later.
 
Sep 1, 2008 at 10:34 PM Post #503 of 877
Hi everyone, I have stumbled across this site while trying to find an inline amplifier. Basically this may be slightly off topic but I have I used to have the Nokia N91 phone and managed to get some cables to connect it into my in car Pioneer head unit (via IP-Bus). The audio quality was pretty good (along with the rest of my audio setup - 2 subs, 2 amps, Infinity speakers, etc).

However, last week I have upgraded to the Samsung Omnia i900 phone and I have found the audio output of this handset to be significantly lower than the Nokia. I have managed to modify the gain controls slightly on my amps but its not brilliant. I'm wondering if this Fiio pre-amp could sit inline between the Samsung phone and the Pioneer headunit.

Any opinions / suggestions, etc??

Many thanks
 
Sep 1, 2008 at 11:00 PM Post #504 of 877
Quote:

Originally Posted by prodigymad /img/forum/go_quote.gif
text


Yes you could do that, but the static it produces when it's near GSM traffic (i.e. cellphones) is really unbearable
frown.gif
 
Sep 1, 2008 at 11:38 PM Post #505 of 877
^ Yeah, good way to explain the importance of gapless.

If you listen via cell-phone does the 'beep beep beep' interference bother you. If it does, imagine it after every song.
 
Sep 2, 2008 at 9:08 AM Post #506 of 877
Hi, thanks for the replies. Basically when I use the handset in the car I switch the phone to "flight mode" which disconnects it from the GSM networks anyway.

I have found some audio output test results for the Samsung Omnia but I'm not too sure if they are any good
confused_face.gif
, or if the Fiio would improve it much. How about the Minibox D (or F) or the Xin SuperMicro?

Test

Frequency response: +0.37, -1.15
Noise level: -79.3
Dynamic range: 79.3
THD: 0.0039
IMD + Noise: 0.027
Stereo crosstalk: -78.7

gsmarena_a001.png
 
Sep 2, 2008 at 4:24 PM Post #507 of 877
I have a Sennheiser PX100 and I was wondering what the synergy with that phone and the fiio's would have? Anyone have any idea? Since I'm considering it for my entry into headphone amps
icon10.gif
 
Sep 2, 2008 at 4:27 PM Post #508 of 877
Quote:

Originally Posted by Crikey /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I have a Sennheiser PX100 and I was wondering what the synergy with that phone and the fiio's would have? Anyone have any idea? Since I'm considering it for my entry into headphone amps
icon10.gif



I have not tried the combo, but from adding 1 and 1, the sound would probably be VERY muddy. I find the PX100 warm and bassy, and the fiio warm and bassy. Not the very best combination. But, I have not tried it.
 
Sep 2, 2008 at 4:32 PM Post #509 of 877
Quote:

Originally Posted by Crikey /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I have a Sennheiser PX100 and I was wondering what the synergy with that phone and the fiio's would have? Anyone have any idea? Since I'm considering it for my entry into headphone amps
icon10.gif



Tried it, but didn't like it
frown.gif

Just more bass and less highs.. So basically a PX100 on steroids.
Unbalanced Sound, thy name is PX100+FiiO.
 
Sep 2, 2008 at 5:15 PM Post #510 of 877
Quote:

Originally Posted by prodigymad /img/forum/go_quote.gif

Test

Frequency response: +0.37, -1.15
Noise level: -79.3
Dynamic range: 79.3
THD: 0.0039
IMD + Noise: 0.027
Stereo crosstalk: -78.7

gsmarena_a001.png



Wow, I wouldn't be surprised if both the Apple 3G and the Omnia are made in the same Foxconn factory looking at that. Doubt it though as Samsung are known to make and assemble everything in South Korea unlike most electronics manufacturers who OEM their stuff to Shenzhen, China or in AMD's case, Malaysia. Although the Apple 3G could be using Samsung parts = won't be surprised either.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top