MayaTlab
1000+ Head-Fier
Hello,
I've decided to get my audio addiction to a new level and I plan to get a very nice sounding home system in the near future (to me that means around 2 years). However, I'm also in the process of replacing my IEMs with portable headphones (due to fit issues, not related to the tips but to my jaw anatomy).
I originally thought to get a pair of Audio Technica ESW10 / ES10 (most probably the latter since they seem roughly equal in SQ - though with a different signature - and that the former's price is way too high in proportion). Then later on, I would buy a quality home system (with a nice decent budget).
However, I'm also tempted to "unify" the two by buying an Ultrasone Edition 8, use it as a portable pair of cans on the go (I've seen their dimensions and that's portable enough to me), and then buy the remaining elements for a decent home system later on.
I perfectly know that you'll tell me that using Edition 8 as a portable solution would be a waste, and I would totally agree with you. Yet The idea of having only one pair of headphones is very tempting (I tend to prefer minimizing the number of items I own as much as possible for some weird reason). Additionally, it seems according to reviews that the Edition 8 are very polyvalent, which is a very nice characteristic to me : I tends to listen to almost any kind of music, with a particular penchant towards difficultly classifiable music
. Also, the idea of not having to "upgrade" for a certain time is very tempting - I appreciate to keep what I buy for a long time and develop a sort of "connection" with quality items.
My question is rather simple : there would be no point for me to buy the Edition 8 if they cannot perform at least as well if not better on a portable source than the ES(W)10 AND as a home setup. If they're better as a portable solution than the former two, and still very good as a home setup, I'll be fine.
So my question is the following : if you tried the edition 8 and one of those two AT cans above, would you say that the Edition 8 will perform better than the AT plugged into a portable source (either Cowon S9 or iPod + LOD + Amp, both in Lossless files - I'm currently re-encoding my entire library in FLAC but I can very easily re-encode it in Apple Lossless if necessary) ? I'm particularly looking at the following : instrument separation, soundstage / imaging, dynamics, "speed".
I personally doubt they'll be noticeably better on the Cowon solution, though I feel there could be a difference on the iPod solution (with the appropriate amp).
What is your opinion ?
PS : I do not mind walking around with 1500 dollars on my head. I've been walking in various cities with expensive photo gear without trouble and I know how to stay discrete. I'll probably pick the palladium version though (less shiny). Maybe even make them look cheaper in a yet to be determined and non destructive way (as I do with cameras and gaffer tape).
PS II : If I go for a separate solution, I'm still very likely to get as a home setup closed cans. So the Edition 8 would still be on the menu.
I've decided to get my audio addiction to a new level and I plan to get a very nice sounding home system in the near future (to me that means around 2 years). However, I'm also in the process of replacing my IEMs with portable headphones (due to fit issues, not related to the tips but to my jaw anatomy).
I originally thought to get a pair of Audio Technica ESW10 / ES10 (most probably the latter since they seem roughly equal in SQ - though with a different signature - and that the former's price is way too high in proportion). Then later on, I would buy a quality home system (with a nice decent budget).
However, I'm also tempted to "unify" the two by buying an Ultrasone Edition 8, use it as a portable pair of cans on the go (I've seen their dimensions and that's portable enough to me), and then buy the remaining elements for a decent home system later on.
I perfectly know that you'll tell me that using Edition 8 as a portable solution would be a waste, and I would totally agree with you. Yet The idea of having only one pair of headphones is very tempting (I tend to prefer minimizing the number of items I own as much as possible for some weird reason). Additionally, it seems according to reviews that the Edition 8 are very polyvalent, which is a very nice characteristic to me : I tends to listen to almost any kind of music, with a particular penchant towards difficultly classifiable music
My question is rather simple : there would be no point for me to buy the Edition 8 if they cannot perform at least as well if not better on a portable source than the ES(W)10 AND as a home setup. If they're better as a portable solution than the former two, and still very good as a home setup, I'll be fine.
So my question is the following : if you tried the edition 8 and one of those two AT cans above, would you say that the Edition 8 will perform better than the AT plugged into a portable source (either Cowon S9 or iPod + LOD + Amp, both in Lossless files - I'm currently re-encoding my entire library in FLAC but I can very easily re-encode it in Apple Lossless if necessary) ? I'm particularly looking at the following : instrument separation, soundstage / imaging, dynamics, "speed".
I personally doubt they'll be noticeably better on the Cowon solution, though I feel there could be a difference on the iPod solution (with the appropriate amp).
What is your opinion ?
PS : I do not mind walking around with 1500 dollars on my head. I've been walking in various cities with expensive photo gear without trouble and I know how to stay discrete. I'll probably pick the palladium version though (less shiny). Maybe even make them look cheaper in a yet to be determined and non destructive way (as I do with cameras and gaffer tape).
PS II : If I go for a separate solution, I'm still very likely to get as a home setup closed cans. So the Edition 8 would still be on the menu.