Dr.J
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2007
- Posts
- 169
- Likes
- 33
Audioraider, very nice, indeed! I have unit no#4 and did the same attenuator mode, using the goldpoint and yes, indeed, a fine upgrade!
Enjoy!
Enjoy!
I have extensively compared the Sophia with the 5691 and it’s not even close. The Sophia has a soft presentation with a narrow soundstage with a Vérité closed. of all the tubes I have rolled, if you consider the 5691 an A the closest competitor would be the tung sol 6SU7 black glass and that would rate a B-. I have used the 5691 in 300B mono blocks for years and numerous other amps, there is a reason why it is the holy Grail of 6SL7. For pure sound quality there has never been a tube that can compete with it in my experience.I know you're into electronic music, and this should be electronic music end game, I'm sure you figured out. Redbase is the right tube for it. Enjoy the bass out of the HD800 (that's right, I said bass out of the HD800).
Nice. I had @Mr.Sneis' #3 for awhile.
Later, I had its feedback modified too.
Since then I've sold my ZDSE though (But I still have the Eddie Current Electra for my Stax).
I wanted to lower the ZOut.What was the benefit of the feedback mod?
The original zd is OTL and the later version the zds is transformer coupled and comes with a knob to toggle between h/l impedance so the later versions are better suited for your use case. Unfortunately Craig has retired so you won't be able to get one new.The different versions of the Zana Deux is quite confusing. Can someone tell me where the Zana Deux lies in the ZD range and which versions are suited for low-impedance-high-sensitivity headphones?
Ah, so for my purposes (low-impedance-high-sensitivity), I shouldn't consider the ZD SE right?The original zd is OTL and the later version the zds is transformer coupled and comes with a knob to toggle between h/l impedance so the later versions are better suited for your use case. Unfortunately Craig has retired so you won't be able to get one new.
Interesting, I assumed ZDS was OTL with low output impedance. I didn't know it was transformer coupled. Everywhere I read, ZDS is referred to as OTL. I have read that it has fairly low output impedance of 3 and 10 (or was it 8?)? Question is, how does OTL achieve the low output impedance?The original zd is OTL and the later version the zds is transformer coupled and comes with a knob to toggle between h/l impedance so the later versions are better suited for your use case. Unfortunately Craig has retired so you won't be able to get one new.
Ah, so for my purposes (low-impedance-high-sensitivity), I shouldn't consider the ZD SE right?
Get the studio b. Not sure if Craig have enough transformers for another run but that is the only option left. ZD has been discontinued for years and EC amps are hard to come by in classifieds.Interesting, I assumed ZDS was OTL with low output impedance. I didn't know it was transformer coupled. Everywhere I read, ZDS is referred to as OTL. I have read that it has fairly low output impedance of 3 and 10 (or was it 8?)? Question is, how does OTL achieve the low output impedance?