neo_lam
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2006
- Posts
- 10
- Likes
- 0
flashed Lurker 2.5.1 L2....bass are more refined.....details are still great.....so far no complaint...nice one!!!!
The other day I did a FULL format to FAT32 using ridgecrop and followed the tips from lurker on post 9032 http://www.head-fi.org/t/697035/dx90-2x-sabre-1st-page-downloads-info-inst-lurker0-fw-mod-link-1st-page-new-fw-2-3-0/9030#post_11037042
It seemed to work great on the stock ibasso 2.1.5 but not on his new 2.5.1L2 so I bought a Lexar 633x 128gb to see if a different card would agree better with the new firmware
I formatted it to exFAT I'm going to see how it works later tonightRidgecrop is what I used for FAT32 for my Samsung 128G. You should be fine.
Is it as stable as 2.5.1L0?flashed Lurker 2.5.1 L2....bass are more refined.....details are still great.....so far no complaint...nice one!!!!
flashed Lurker 2.5.1 L2....bass are more refined.....details are still great.....so far no complaint...nice one!!!!
Is it as stable as 2.5.1L0?
If only 2.1.5 L4 worked with the batch tool ...I will be shocked if you tell me you like the sound of 2.5.1 L2. Better bass?? Whaat? Boomy and LESS detailed than L0, just dominant volume-wise (presence yes). Perhaps missing some very low frequencies too. You are right about the highs though, they are "butchered". I also get a very 2d feeling out of soundstage, everything so pale and unexciting. (2.1.5 L4 had similar bass and mids but sounded fantastic!)
I will be shocked if you tell me you like the sound of 2.5.1 L2. Better bass?? Whaat? Boomy and LESS detailed than L0, just dominant volume-wise (presence yes). Perhaps missing some very low frequencies too. You are right about the highs though, they are "butchered". I also get a very 2d feeling out of soundstage, everything so pale and unexciting. (2.1.5 L4 had similar bass and mids but sounded fantastic!)
So the dx90 isn't glitchy simple as thatWhy is this batch tool so important?