- Joined
- Oct 22, 2011
- Posts
- 3,505
- Likes
- 248
Okay guys. I just thought it would be "interesting" to discuss, but I'm not super into it or anything. No seperate thread will be created.
My gut feeling was that the DX90 schematic looked better, part of the reason I went for the DX90, but I could not explain why so I just wanted to get other people's thoughts. To me it looks like the DX90 has better seperation of duties while the X5 has used more dual channel op-amps, while Ibasso went for more single-channel op-amps and thus used a greater number of them. Technically, I understand they should be the same anyway, but yeah I guess the proof will be in the pudding. I might go ahead and order the X5 anyway to satisfy my curiosity. We'll see...
Also, I'm a huge fan of the Sabre delta-sigma sound. I sort of got hooked with the Concero, realized it was for me. That was the other reason I went for the DX90, although I hear great things about the PCM1792.
My gut feeling was that the DX90 schematic looked better, part of the reason I went for the DX90, but I could not explain why so I just wanted to get other people's thoughts. To me it looks like the DX90 has better seperation of duties while the X5 has used more dual channel op-amps, while Ibasso went for more single-channel op-amps and thus used a greater number of them. Technically, I understand they should be the same anyway, but yeah I guess the proof will be in the pudding. I might go ahead and order the X5 anyway to satisfy my curiosity. We'll see...
Also, I'm a huge fan of the Sabre delta-sigma sound. I sort of got hooked with the Concero, realized it was for me. That was the other reason I went for the DX90, although I hear great things about the PCM1792.