Separate names with a comma.
Ha! That was exactly what I thought when I read that. Marketing types will say anything
Umm.. I think this is flawed logic. It would be nice, but I don't think we can deduce the price point from the model # being half of the dx100.
get the DX100 then, you want this player to drive iems and harder to drive full size cans as well, do you want wifi , album art and everything else for less money too?
I think most people in this thread are happy to get a PORTABLE dap for their SENSITIVE iems.
Exactly. Looks like the DX50 has lineout, so throw an amp at it for driving the LCD2 on the go. Want the perfect one-box solution? Get the DX100.
as simple as that!
Is it too much to hope it has at least one form of digital output?
Thats a maybe i guess, not completely implausible, the ak100 do have an optic out
No flawed logic, just invisible humor.
Why is that? Have you read somewhere that the DX50 is being purpose built just just for Sensitive iems? As I mentioned, the DX100 isn't in my price range. I merely stated my preference that the DX50 would work well with full size headphones. Apparently stating an opinion outside the elite club that is "most people in this thread" is not to be tolerated.
Same again, where is the information that states that the DX50 is not going to be powerful enough for full size cans? Are you employed by iBasso and empowered to make design decisions for them perhaps?
Just thinking out loud, stating what I hope. Much like you did
Only iBasso knows what it is going to power and what the thrust of the DX50 will be, as far as I know. Enjoy the music. It's all good. :^)
lol yep thats just the kind of support that was needed on this thread, and your gonna be the judge of whose wrong? he was just stating what he wants as much as u were. Anyway, i dont want to waste my time on someone as miserable as yourself, if someone doesnt agree with what u think is right .. doesnt make him wrong.