DX50 a new smaller DAP from iBasso. Spec. page 1. Impressions start on page. . .
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:01 AM Post #3,391 of 3,609
Quote:
 
If it is aluminium it better be more ding resistance.  The x3 is very very suspicious to dings and dents.....  the hifiman look worse in plastic but is actually very sturdy and can take much more abuse.  I guess the takeaway is that aluminium is not necessary implying sturdiness.  Need thick sheet but it add cost so I'm not hopeful it would be very sturdy.  Would be happy if it is better than x3.

 
and the front aluminium skin at the edge of the buttons peels easily too... not to mention i have dusts in my screen
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:08 AM Post #3,392 of 3,609
Quote:
 
and the front aluminium skin at the edge of the buttons peels easily too... not to mention i have dusts in my screen

 
On your X3 you mean?
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:11 AM Post #3,393 of 3,609
Quote:
You bet. I've never been a fan of using a DAP on its own without an amp. Feels rather boring to me, I'd that's the case.
smily_headphones1.gif


Maybe I just like the extra boost, power and enhancement in sound quality of an amp.


Good man... I need to sign out from this forum or else... I may spend money again possibly an amp.....
etysmile.gif

 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:18 AM Post #3,394 of 3,609
Quote:
 
On your X3 you mean?

 
yep on my X3, and i really have no idea how the bits of aluminium skin by the buttons peeled when the silicone case was on 24/7
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:20 AM Post #3,395 of 3,609
Quote:
 
yep on my X3, and i really have no idea how the bits of aluminium skin by the buttons peeled when the silicone case was on 24/7

Hmm aluminum shouldn't do that. Did you ask Fiio what's up with that?
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:23 AM Post #3,396 of 3,609
Good man... I need to sign out from this forum or else... I may spend money again possibly an amp..... :etysmile:


Did I tell you my C5 is the same length and width as the DX50? :wink: mainly the reason why I am eager to amp it.
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:24 AM Post #3,398 of 3,609
Quote:
Hmm aluminum shouldn't do that. Did you ask Fiio what's up with that?

 
The ones on x3 is really flimsy.  Won't be surprised if it's guage30 or less.  I'd rather they use engineering plastics.  Fiio do provide a silicon case cover to protect but it looks really hideous with the condom on..... I'm in fact a bit worried the same would be for DX50 after learning it's price... well hope to find out in just a couple more days!
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:24 AM Post #3,399 of 3,609
Quote:
Hmm aluminum shouldn't do that. Did you ask Fiio what's up with that?

 
the front part is just the skin brushed like aluminium, not even sure if its real aluminium.. but i'll be sending my unit in for repair once i get either the DX50 or AK100... still contemplating despite the AK's big 22 ohm setback... >_<
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:25 AM Post #3,400 of 3,609
Quote:
Did I tell you my C5 is the same length and width as the DX50?
wink.gif
mainly the reason why I am eager to amp it.

THAT'S how big it is... omg
 
btw ANY reviews yet? 
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:26 AM Post #3,401 of 3,609
Quote:
 
The ones on x3 is really flimsy.  Won't be surprised if it's guage30 or less.  I'd rather they use engineering plastics.  Fiio do provide a silicon case cover to protect but it looks really hideous with the condom on..... I'm in fact a bit worried the same would be for DX50 after learning it's price... well hope to find out in just a couple more days!

 
LOL, yes i agree the silicon case looks very wrong... and the build quality for the DX50 is also one of the reason i'm contemplating the AK100, even when it cost more than 2x with SQ probably on par.. or lower for the AK100 since i'm using IEMs mostly
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:28 AM Post #3,402 of 3,609
THAT'S how big it is... omg

btw ANY reviews yet? 


Yup, the DX50 is only wider by 4mm, which is really nothing when you have amp bands on the C5. It measures 10cm long.

Reviews for which? The DX50? None yet, as no one has the DAP except for one dude who only posts pictures and says nothing.
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:28 AM Post #3,403 of 3,609
Quote:
 
LOL, yes i agree the silicon case looks very wrong... and the build quality for the DX50 is also one of the reason i'm contemplating the AK100, even when it cost more than 2x with SQ probably on par.. or lower for the AK100 since i'm using IEMs mostly

Really it's built poorly [is happy he's getting a hm801 <3] BRICK ftw xD
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:33 AM Post #3,404 of 3,609
Quote:
 
LOL, yes i agree the silicon case looks very wrong... and the build quality for the DX50 is also one of the reason i'm contemplating the AK100, even when it cost more than 2x with SQ probably on par.. or lower for the AK100 since i'm using IEMs mostly

 
Get a demo with your IEMs/HP before ordering AK100... I actually prefer the x3 sound over AK100.  But yes the AK built is impeccable.   I got suck into AKs with it's aesthetics, but even with the AK120 the sound is lacking dynamic and punch and is gathering dust.
 
If you had follow this thread earlier I was one of the few "stupid" folks hoping for a $500 DX50 with the AK100 type build and better sound....  well.... 
 
Sep 2, 2013 at 10:57 AM Post #3,405 of 3,609
Quote:
If you had follow this thread earlier I was one of the few "stupid" folks hoping for a $500 DX50 with the AK100 type build and better sound....  well.... 

 
kkcc, I didnt understand your point before but I now also share the same opinion. It would have been a AK100 with LO and without the 22.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top