How many daps are using the ROHM chip? Not many and I don't think AK is the most forward thinking except to price their products so high that people think they must be the best but that is an illusion based on cost and not total performance.
I didn't say A&K was the most forward thinking. I said that A&K was first DAP to use AKM's new 2 chip solution.
I think Ibasso and Cayin are the only 2 using the ROHM chip.
AFAIK, the only devices that are "Roon ready" are A&K. But no, the DX320 is NOT Roon ready. Having said that, I have read (either here or on the DX300 thread) of people successfully using Roon Arc. Try doing a search on one of the two threads for it?!
Why is Roon Arc not working on Ibasso DX320. Installation was ok, see the library but can’t play files because of “unexpected playback failure”. Fiio M17 does not have this so the problem lies with Ibasso…
AFAIK, the only devices that are "Roon ready" are A&K. But no, the DX320 is NOT Roon ready. Having said that, I have read (either here or on the DX300 thread) of people successfully using Roon Arc. Try doing a search on one of the two threads for it?!
Yes I see that but the new issue with AKM is that:
**it is now a two chip solution = more circuit board space.
** the S/N figures are actually mono measurments to boost figure.
** higher power requirements.
** still based on "velvet sound" topology platform.
So I think I'll pass on any future AKM.
I believe M17 still has older Android version 10.
Dx320 has version 11.
New Android versions always need apps to catch up.
Roon needs to be notified = not here, they won't know, although eventual compatability would be hoped.
Also the newer Android version has some file storage protection issues for apps.
Yes I see that but the new issue with AKM is that:
**it is now a two chip solution = more circuit board space.
** the S/N figures are actually mono measurments to boost figure.
** higher power requirements.
** still based on "velvet sound" topology platform.
So I think I'll pass on any future AKM.
Some of ROHM's marketing is cheesy, at best, but that's beside the point. I think that it's shortsighted to dismiss AKM's newest technology without auditioning. Right now, I'd love to have the opportunity to audition the 320, the N8ii and the new SP3000. I have no dog in the fight. I'm not a fan boy of any specific chip manufacturer. I'd like to see Cirrus Logic step up their game and come out with something new. Competition tends to improve every ones product.
Smartphones and computers that run Roon software/app as endpoints aren’t necessarily Roon certified. If they are, it means that it natively supports RAAT. (Not just by running Roon app) In addition, it means Roon tested said device and it passes whatever stability checks and user experience benchmarks. A Roon certified device should offer better stability and fully transparent RAAT. However, you can still achieve this with the device running Roon app. There isn’t loss of functionality.
I lump the dx320 into smartphones because it is essentially an android phone sans cellular connectivity and added well developed audio circuitry.
I believe M17 still has older Android version 10.
Dx320 has version 11.
New Android versions always need apps to catch up.
Roon needs to be notified = not here, they won't know, although eventual compatability would be hoped.
Also the newer Android version has some file storage protection issues for apps.
The android platform is not nor ever been their focus. Ibasso has to implement native RAAT and have device certified. I recently saw currawong posting on Roon forums asking them to “step it up”.
I think that it's shortsighted to dismiss AKM's newest technology without auditioning. Right now, I'd love to have the opportunity to audition the 320, the N8ii and the new SP3000.
You have a good point. Although I feel the 320 & N8ii have more similarities than differences (to me), so I definitely would like to hear that new SP3000, as it would display the new AKM dac chip in a portable design.
Too bad the SP3000 doesn't even have the output power of a dx300 w/amp11, on the specs sheet.
Ibasso did an exceptional job to display those Cirrus chips in a topology that produced top level realism. I don't know if any other manufacturer squeezed so much performance out of Cirrus before iBasso shown their mastery.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.