Anaxilus
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2010
- Posts
- 12,065
- Likes
- 339
Quote:
Indeed. And they don't have a good control - that is to say, they don't show that their Epson projector has the resolution to show those details at all, so they cannot say for sure that the cables are why it is blurring.
Exactly. Projector is about the worst possible choice for eyeballing differences even if the projector choice was or wasn't the best. You get diffusion varying over ranges unlike a static screen w/ a set pixel density.
________________
As to the comments about science being it's own animal apart from logical philosophy the nuance has again been lost if you believe that. Scientific method is wholly derivative of logic as is Binary language even. There is no obfuscating unless one is trying to straw man the point into some notion of post modern linguistic deconstruction or whatever else. To put it more simply and clearly consider the differences between these two propositions.
One-Based on the following experiment, no perceived measurable deviation has been found to account for any perceptible differences among the cables tested.
Two-All cables sound the same.
Which of the two is applying logic and the scientific method?
The two propositions also do not say the same thing though many here seem to think so. To make the leap from proposition one to proposition two you have to make a subjective leap based on inductive logic. Not that there is anything wrong with that if you actually recognize it and understand the difference.