[Nachash]

Ok, so... i'm really confused, i don't know which one should i choose. I know that the O-one is less expensive, and i know that both of them are detailed/analytical. But i don't know which one has the most detail.

Any suggestion?

 

[mythless]

I doubt anyone has both.

 

[Nachash]

yeah, i was thinking the same thing... at this point i will go for the PS320, they seems more portable and less "showy".

 

[mythless]

lol, I would have to agree.  The PS320 are true portable while the Ortofon are quasi-portable. 

 

[Nachash]

http://graphs.headphone.com/graphCompare.php?graphType=0&graphID[]=2023&graphID[]=1773
 
I don't know ho to read these things ._.

 

[mythless]

huh, I didn't know the PS320 were cheaper than the MS400.

 

[Nachash]

Do you think that the ms400 are better?

 

[mythless]

Depends on what you are looking for.

 

[Nachash]

detailed/analytical sound xD

 

[mythless]

O-One, there is no doubt about that

 

[Nachash]

oh my god, i'm gonna go mad.
 
xD
 

They seems so different in that graph, but i can't read it.

 

[toughnut]

Graph is just.... a graph.
 
Doesnt really represent what you gonna hear.

 

[Pianist]

In that price range, Shure SRH840 is a very resolving headphone. I haven't heard the Ortofons, but I will be amazed if there is a closed can under $200 that sounds more detailed than SRH840. Ok, exceptions may be vintage Orthodynamics, but that's about it.

 

[mythless]

Quote:

In that price range, Shure SRH840 is a very resolving headphone. I haven't heard the Ortofons, but I will be amazed if there is a closed can under $200 that sounds more detailed than SRH840. Ok, exceptions may be vintage Orthodynamics, but that's about it.

Hrmm well, I guess I'll have to check it out.  I could say the two are very close when it comes to detail, but I couldn't tell anyone which one is more detailed.