Quote:
Originally Posted by Godkin /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I couldn't disagree with you more, Gradofan. I've done my own comparisons between the two, and my conclusions were entirely different. But that's hifi for you.
As I said, this is a personal opinion. What good for one is just okay or bad for another.
|
I think the difference must either be the specific mods we each had, or the burn in, or a difference between the early models and later models... or... the synergy with the rest of the set up.
Also my modified CD-25 at 24/192 provides simply incredible detail, clarity, and soundstaging (using the OPA2134s, rather than the dual channel OPA627s) - that chip also adds great texture, resolution and bass to it. I think my PF XCAN v3 permits all that to shine through, moreso than my DV332.
Of course... I'm focusing on the clarity, resolution, organic detail, and overall refinement, which enhances the postioning in the soundstage, as well as the natural nature of the sound (e.g. realness of the snares and cymbals, etc.). Those attributes are simply stunning in the setup I describe.
Until today... I was focusing more on the power, weight, and tone body of the DV332, which is clearly better than the PF XCANv3.
But today... something just seem to come together with that set up. Perhaps it was only "seller's remorse." But... it seemed real. It was so impressive... I can tell you... had I experienced it previously... I would not have sold my PF XCANv3. But... I was focusing on my other DAC's, and the impressive weight, tone and ambience of the DV332, rather than the incredible resolution and refinement of the sound, I finally noticed with my modified CD-25 and the PF XCANv3.