Dan Clark Audio Stealth Review, Interview, Measurements
Sep 23, 2022 at 5:54 PM Post #5,176 of 5,994
But I think result is same .. the stealth between 20hz and 8kz is almost Harman 100% compliant where measurements are quite reliable without high frequencies Cup artefacts with artificial ears.
I am not sure there is any interest to analyse known as unreliable 10khz to 20khz measurements.
1663969712282.png
 
Sep 23, 2022 at 6:08 PM Post #5,177 of 5,994
But I think result is same .. the stealth between 20hz and 8kz is almost Harman 100% compliant where measurements are quite reliable without high frequencies Cup artefacts with artificial ears.
I am not sure there is any interest to analyse known as unreliable 10khz to 20khz measurements.
You'd better tell that to the person who published the ranking and calculated the score. i only said that, according to that score, both headphones are tuned to follow the Harman frequency response curve.
 
Sep 23, 2022 at 10:52 PM Post #5,179 of 5,994
Anyone tried Stealth with a DAP? I have Shanglin M9 and am looking for a closed can to listen in bed without disturbing the wife. I prefer not to start chaining another amp like C9. On paper it seems like most DAP are going to clip. My other option is to get like the Liric. It seems to be much easier to drive.
DX300 Max and DX300 Max Ti are great with Stealth.
 
Sep 24, 2022 at 8:52 PM Post #5,183 of 5,994
My ears slightly touch the material over the AMTS. Also, I sometimes hear light planar crinkle when my ears are hot and I turn my head (nothing playing or quiet passages).

That said, the Stealth is a fantastic headphone that gets a ton of use. Especially when it's too noisy to use an open-back.
 
Sep 24, 2022 at 10:34 PM Post #5,184 of 5,994
Why would mastering studios spend so much money on their studio if the last chain in the end user is up for 'artistry'. 😂
Or EQing…so far I thought your relentless contributions mildly entertaining but have migrated to camp *tiresome nuisance*.
 
Sep 25, 2022 at 4:58 AM Post #5,185 of 5,994
The idea of ranking headphones against the Harman target curve is completely asinine. There seems to be an addiction amongst certain people that have them treating science as some kind of God-like arbiter of goodness and truth that the result comes to something closer to religion than actual science. Even on the most superficial level, the ranking ignores the most basic issue of individual unit variations (and then, don't get me started on the impossibility of measuring Apple's Airpods, due to the way they work). More fundamentally, it completely ignores the limitations of Sean Olive's work -- even the very intent of what his research aimed to achieve.
 
Sep 25, 2022 at 2:28 PM Post #5,186 of 5,994
Not to mention Dan Clark himself saying:
Naah! I like my upper bass boosted!
hell with Harman curve ...
 
Sep 25, 2022 at 2:31 PM Post #5,187 of 5,994
Not to mention Dan Clark himself saying:
Naah! I like my upper bass boosted!
hell with Harman curve ...
Yeah I really like him. Cool guy 😎

A flagship with Bass above Harman, that deserved some of my money
 
Sep 25, 2022 at 5:04 PM Post #5,188 of 5,994
Yeah...my lily was
Yeah I really like him. Cool guy 😎

A flagship with Bass above Harman, that deserved some of my money

Basshead 😁

NOMAX

PS.lol
 
Last edited:
Sep 25, 2022 at 5:10 PM Post #5,189 of 5,994

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top