Dobrescu George
Reviewer: AudiophileHeaven
yeah, mine too... and my fear is to not loose it over time beacuse of the volume... no one should calll this discussion an arguing... if it would have been an argue, i would been banned....
apart from the thing that they are completly oposite?... the thing that one does not have the mids, so no voice, and other... other does not have guitars at all...
they are not similar in my view...but they are not that well with any other cans... in fact, it is pretty horrible with any cans i tried... tell me, do they sound great, with ath m50 ?......
apart from the thing that they are completly oposite?... the thing that one does not have the mids, so no voice, and other... other does not have guitars at all...
they are not similar in my view...but they are not that well with any other cans... in fact, it is pretty horrible with any cans i tried... tell me, do they sound great, with ath m50 ?......
i agree they are completely opposite, but i think typhoon means that both have highly boosted frequencies.
i also agree that they both sound horrible, especially the first one, on all the headphones i have tried them on including the ath m50.
when i reduced the volume to 15, the second one was decent though and sounds fairly similar to typoon's settings for the ath m50.
most of the time 15 is ok for me, as my house is usually quiet.
also, i dont know whether you've done it, but if you reset your J3 by deleting the file pmp_usb and choose non-eu when you turn it on again, the volume becomes considerably higher than before.
Hi!
I'm using an S9, but here is what I use with my M50
80 Hz- 5 - wide
300 Hz - 2 - wide
1.4 kHz - 6 - wide
4.1 kHz - 6 - wide
11.7 kHz - 5 - wide
BBE:10
Mach3Bass : 1
3D Surround: 1
MP Enhance: On
Stereo Enhance: 2
Reverb: Off
I needed more forward vocals and mids, this is what I've settled on....
Mainly on volume 20-22, but I never go higher....
I am speechless. Do I even have to say why? Did you make those settings yourself? If S9 is similar enough in terms of sound, this is ridiculous - not coincidence (I mean maybe partially, but yeah...). Have you seen my settings?!.. Only differences really are that I prefer more bass and you take to the likeability of BBE enhancements more.
My volume range is 22-26 mostly on my ATH-M50's and 19-22 on my Brainwavz M2's. 20-22 on is still perfect and quite audible on the M50's, as for any pair really, only starting below 20 does the sound get worsened. I just prefer it a bit louder since I listen to a lot of Rock and like hearing all the "background" subtleties more distinctly (Especially for bands like Queen and Muse). Just in general Rock is meant to be listened to louder so I guess I feel that too.
Audio Technica ATH-M50
The purposes of these headphones I'm sure are well known, so they tend to stylize every genre of music very similarly; EQ can only do so much with these... Regardless though, harshness in certain frequencies and clarity are factors that still make a difference and that's what I feel was affected. I also tried to push bass to a natural state without it getting aggressively fake. Not purposely, in accordance with the flat EQ that's suggested about the headphones, the EQ it ended up similarly so as I was slowly making my adjustments (the lesser the gaps, I feel that suggests good things).
EQ-
80 Hz Normal: +7 dB (If your phones are new/not burned in, you can increase it to +8 dB if you'd like)
220 Hz Wide: +5 dB
1.4 kHz Wide: +6 dB
3.0 kHz Wide: +6 dB (You can try +5 dB if you'd like; for some things, 6 may be a little much)
11.7 kHz Wide: +5 dB
BBE+-
BBE: 4
Mach3Bass: 8
3D Surround: 1 (Your choice to keep it off or at 1 really...)
MP Enhance: On (I think this is more so important with these headphones)
SE-
Stereo Enhance: 3 (Your choice to keep it 1 through 4)
Reverb: Off
*Of course everything can be changed to your preference. I was mentioning subtle differences that wouldn't change the essence of my settings.