I haven't done any more A/B'ing with my UM3X since the day I got my CK100s; two reasons for this: a) Since I liked them so much out of the box, I wanted to get the full flavour of the CK100s and b) I sent my new UM3X back to Westone yesterday as there seems to be a 'rattling' problem with some sets from the first batch (?), so I decided to get a replacement to be absolutely sure I have a fully working pair - I didn't experience any problems myself but might have in the future, so better get a replacement now.
But yesterday, as mentioned on my previous post, I A/B'd my CK100s against my ES3X and noticed a slight better performance from the former as a possible result of burn-in.
So, what makes me think I might end up selling my UM3X right now? Hard to tell, really, and my intention was to do a final, more extensive, A/B'ing at the weekend, but right now I think the CK100s are ever so slightly more neutral. That's why I said I think more people may find them a little less exciting than the UM3X. But I find this slight flatter response just a little more appealing. Paradoxically the CK100s sounded closer to my ES3X yesterday (haven't A/B'd them today and don't intend to) than the 2 previous days; paradoxically because the UM3X always sounded very similar to my ES3X, but not that good obviously, and they are, after all, cousins/ brothers.
Funnily, now and again I catch myself trying to find something wrong with the CK100s, perhaps because of the fear of making the wrong decision if I sell my UM3Xs - this is just how close they are in my concept of good sounding phones. I'm also trying to avoid the pitfalls of the novelty factor, ie "Yeah, this is a different IEM, sounds great, not many people have it or can afford to have it, therefore I like it, it's the best" This turned out to be the last top-tier I happened to test but it really wasn't my intention to do so, and it really happened by chance after I saw that post (not about the CK100s) mentioning the CK100s in passing. In fact, the opposite is true as the first top-tier backup I tried recently was the IE8, a very popular IEM and not as expensive (at least in the UK) as the SE535, SM3 & CK100, and, in fact I did like the IE8s, but like I said before they weren't good enough to keep - the gap, in the end, in SQ between them and my ES3X was wider than the gap I remembered from my first set of UM3Xs.
Other aspects that have possibly also made the CK100 my #1 universal at the moment is the comfort, isolation, fantastic cable, and VERY importantly, just like my UM3X, absolutely no listening fatigue after long listening sessions. The UM3X is also excellent in all those areas! The CK100 has better build quality but the new UM3X has a detachable cable.
Mids and treble I still find a little puzzling how brilliant they're rendered, though less puzzling than before - how can they blend so well? The bass, I'm appreciating it a lot too. Basically, a great flat response along the whole freq range.
I wouldn't try to convince others to get the CK100s because I remain convinced many people will not value what I find valuable in the CK100s. But those who do 'get it' with these IEMs, they'll be hooked, I think.
I will be very fair and when my replacement UM3X gets here, I'll give them a very fair last try and then make my final decision. I know it sounds like I'll be keeping my CK100s, but I'm not 100% sure, not counting my chickens yet. Like I said already, the UM3X to me is truly a great IEM.