[Delayeed]

highlighting high sample rates over 192khz is just marketing. In a true blind test nobody can percieve difference between 96khz/192khz enough times in a row for it to not count as luck

 

[Mython]

Someone told me there's a sane thread on Head-fi, somewhere, but, after 8 years of searching, I still haven't found it!

 

[trantan88]

Anyone has tried mojo with K701? I'm considering to buy one to pair with my mojo.

 

[miketlse]

  Anyone has tried mojo with K701? I'm considering to buy one to pair with my mojo.

It is possible to search this thread using the keyword 'K701'
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/784602/chord-mojo-the-official-thread-please-read-the-3rd-post/10800#post_12320526

 

[Light - Man]

  Someone told me there's a sane thread on Head-fi, somewhere, but, after 8 years of searching, I still haven't found it!

 
Mython, I think you should start a new inverse thread called - I am not insane?!
 
I would start it but people would not believe me.

 

 

[Mython]

  Mython, I think you should start a new inverse thread called - I am not insane?!

 
 
I already did - it's linked in post #3. but nobody ever reads it...

 

 

[Mojo ideas]

nobody heard about the newer mojo?

so called mojo+?

with new packaging?

It's just new packaging it had a laser abated serial number written into the case to help us trace units

 

[Nirvana1000]

I just bought a Mojo and the only way it pairs with my Sony Xperia Z5 is to restart the phone while connected to the Mojo.Anyone else have this problem?

 

[michaelgordon]

anybody using moto g4 with mojo ? is it compatible with uapp ?

ive got a moto g4 but not using uapp, workd fine with Onkyo player so cant see why not

 

[jmills8]

ive got a moto g4 but not using uapp, workd fine with Onkyo player so cant see why not

Well Onkyo is the easiest to connect to the Mojo.

 

[howdy]

Well Onkyo is the easiest to connect to the Mojo.

I would agree

 

[SearchOfSub]

I already did - it's linked in post #3. but nobody ever reads it...  

Maybe post#2. 1st post product page/post followed up by FAQ page/post in caps. Just my imo though.

 

[SearchOfSub]

highlighting high sample rates over 192khz is just marketing. In a true blind test nobody can percieve difference between 96khz/192khz enough times in a row for it to not count as luck

I can. But that's after going back and forth - back and forth (A/B) on a 10-20 second audio clips that I saved up and use. But when I stay away from audio for 20-30 mins and come back I can't tell difference or know what sampling rate I'm listening to. But hey, I can also see difference between 120hz and 144hz monitors.

 

[GreenBow]

I can. But that's after going back and forth - back and forth (A/B) on a 10-20 second audio clips that I saved up and use. But when I stay away from audio for 20-30 mins and come back I can't tell difference or know what sampling rate I'm listening to. But hey, I can also see difference between 120hz and 144hz monitors.

Agreed A-B testing tracks one after the other is harder.

 

[headfry]

It has been determined that A/B doesn't work well for telling the difference between levels of compression for your 
listening pleasure. Long term listening to compressed files - say daily for a week or two -
then listening to uncompressed (or less compressed) for the same time period, then switching back
is more helpful/accurate.