BenSherman
Head-Fier
Still using micro USB? Surly not!?That looks like the leaked Mojo 2 photo in the speculation thread.
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/chord-mojo-2-speculation-thread.885405/post-16324058
Still using micro USB? Surly not!?That looks like the leaked Mojo 2 photo in the speculation thread.
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/chord-mojo-2-speculation-thread.885405/post-16324058
Needed for Poly compatibility.Still using micro USB? Surly not!?
That looks like the leaked Mojo 2 photo in the speculation thread.
It would make sense for Poly users. But I have to agree, I am also not a fan of this „Frankenstein Design“ with 2x micro USB and one USB-C…Still using micro USB? Surly not!?
Looks much larger compared to the older mojo. Wouldn’t bet that it will be compatible with polyNeeded for Poly compatibility.
Actually, the picture here looks like the same proportions as my current Mojo, and the USB-C is inset, so Poly should mate fine. It may be a bit longer, or bulge down for the new port a bit, but you would need a new case anyway because of the 4 balls. The end view looks identically sized though.Looks much larger compared to the older mojo. Wouldn’t bet that it will be compatible with poly
Poly isn't meant for Bluetooth.But poly is more outdated than Mojo.
Poly's Bluetooth is a basic 4.1 , low definition.
Poly is more in need of upgrade than Mojo.
to make Mojo backward compatible with Poly does not seem like a wise decision.
Tell that to Chord!Poly isn't meant for Bluetooth.
Tell that to Chord!
They thought is was, as they included one.
Most people who did buy it ! you mean ...I believe his point is that most people aren't buying it for Bluetooth. Bluetooth was more then likely just an afterthought.
Most people who did buy it ! - I don't have any figures, but I bet the ratio of poly owners to Mojo owners is not all that high.
Poly is a niche product for a few - is it outdated?, there is no denying.
Now to make a possible new Mojo update to be backward compatible, solely for the benefit of an outdated device, that is something.
I do understand where you are coming from though, but time will tell.
I suppose Chord know what they are doing.
Poly is 4 years old, but was redesigned due to the turn on issue after several months, and the firmware and app have been in constant redesign. As long as the platform can continue to be updated, I don’t see it as outdated at only 4 years.Most people who did buy it ! you mean ...
- I don't have any figures, but I bet the ratio of poly owners to Mojo owners is not all that high.
Poly is a niche product for a few - is it outdated?, there is no denying.
Now to make a possible new Mojo update to be backward compatible, solely for the benefit of an outdated device, that is something.
I do understand where you are coming from though, but time will tell.
I suppose Chord know what they are doing.
Do you really think Chord might squeeze an m-scaler into a Mojo?Also, any thoughts on what the “M” button on the presumed Mojo2 would do? Rob has said that mScaler and dac shouldn’t be in the same box due to noise, so would there be enough benefit to Mojo2 to have different filters or what?