Should I be worried about this? I’m planning to upgrade to DAVE with my G2.1 and Sablon 2020 USB cable, will both galvanic isolations cause issues or defeat the purpose?Since the G2 has galvanic isolation, as well as Dave, wouldn't that create a ground loop?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CHORD ELECTRONICS DAVE
- Thread starter magiccabbage
- Start date
-
- Tags
- chord-dave
What does you chain look like?Sorry, I don't have a high end streamer, so can't provide an authoritative answer.
You are already at my level - considering Allo or Tinkerboard based streamer.
miketlse
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 8, 2016
- Posts
- 5,990
- Likes
- 3,990
I don't have a DAVE, but I do use various systems according to my mood/need.What does you chain look like?
- old PC > optical out > Mojo or hugo 2
- Mojopoly
- I am intending to resurrect the Shanling M1 > USB > Mojo, for use in the office
A much cheaper SBC based system would be much easier to justify, especially using optical cable to reduce the RFI impact
From what i've heard the software and connectivity has issues, but i've heard that about mojopoly 2.I had planned to get a 2Go,
this sounds amazing.Had it for almost 4 years now. I much preferred it to the Sony TA-ZH1ES and with the risk of upsetting everyone again:old PC > optical out > Mojo
I think Mojo is the best thing Chord makes except Dave. I didn't like the Hugo 2, it sounded too bright to me , even with the mojo filter and i didn't even find the TT2 a big enough leap from Mojo, it was just more of the same, better but not radically different with my easy to drive headphones, and also too bright.
If Dave wasn't around, i would've stuck with Mojo.
I agree, but now that i've heard this cable, i can't unhear it. And i'm kinda calling bs on Dave's jitter immunity. Bent or not, the old one never made DAVE sound like this.A much cheaper SBC based system would be much easier to justify, especially using optical cable to reduce the RFI impact
So i'm more curious what effect would reducing jitter further would have, and i think the best way to do that is starting at the source. And it does resonate with what others have been saying about usb reclocking and etc.
I'm still skeptical but i have to hear it for myself.
saudio7
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2016
- Posts
- 306
- Likes
- 206
I checked ProJect against G1 and G1 is better even if you add better power supply to streambox it sounds brighter.Yeah i was considering getting the Naim nd5 xs2 (bnc and torroidal psu), Lumin u1 mini (everything and switching psu) and Arires G1 (usb and dual lpsu), i feel like Aries is the most streaming focused one. And something cheaper like a ProJect Stream Box S2 Ultra or Stack Audio Link 2 to get a feel for the differences. Or my dealer recommended 3d lab in france.
I was curious if SPDIF data also gets reclocked like usb *allegedly* LOL.
There was a fellow saying he added G1 to his M-scaler/Dave and it made zero difference vs pc and ProJect made it sound worse, he was in awe of the DCS Network bridge, others ended up disappointed by that as well. I guess i'll start with the Naim nd5 xs2, and then the G1.I checked ProJect against G1 and G1 is better even if you add better power supply to streambox it sounds brighter.
As for hqplayer vs m scaler. For me it wasn't even close. Hqplayer and its filters did something to the sound, but effect wasn't close to what is m scaler offering. Sound shapes were flatter not as rounded. Smoothness wasn't the same, only decay feeling seemed to be pretty close.
On what server? The source matters.
Hooster
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2010
- Posts
- 2,159
- Likes
- 1,209
I think Mojo is the best thing Chord makes except Dave. I didn't like the Hugo 2, it sounded too bright to me , even with the mojo filter and i didn't even find the TT2 a big enough leap from Mojo, it was just more of the same, better but not radically different with my easy to drive headphones, and also too bright.
If Dave wasn't around, i would've stuck with Mojo.
Thanks for this, it is very much appreciated.
ubs28
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2013
- Posts
- 3,991
- Likes
- 1,097
To me, it sounds like Chord took the DNA of the Mojo and used it for the Hugo 2. So not sure how people can dislike the Hugo 2 but like Mojo imo.
I actually don’t like the Hugo 2 and Mojo myself. But the only reason I have them is because DAP’s are not good either and they are also more expensive. So it is more like picking the lesser of evils.
I actually don’t like the Hugo 2 and Mojo myself. But the only reason I have them is because DAP’s are not good either and they are also more expensive. So it is more like picking the lesser of evils.
Last edited:
I only did tests using pc and raspberry with ropieee, so cannot comment on other sources etc. What surprised me was change that hqplayer made for mojo. For mojo I would say the improvement was the biggest and I could stick to that.On what server? The source matters.
Well i didn't like it more than Mojo, it just sounded brighter to me, and like the m-scaler i prefer the darker sound over the slightly increased soundstage. To be fair i haven't tried the Hugo2 on optical, just usb, and it makes a huge difference to Mojo. Back then i still believed all Chord dacs are *everything* immune.To me, it sounds like Chord took the DNA of the Mojo and used it for the Hugo 2. So not sure how people can dislike the Hugo 2 but like Mojo imo.
I actually don’t like the Hugo 2 and Mojo myself. But the only reason I have them is because DAP’s are not good either and they are also more expensive. So it is more like picking the lesser of evils.
ubs28
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2013
- Posts
- 3,991
- Likes
- 1,097
The Hugo 2 is indeed brighter. But with the “Mojo filter” it gets closer to the Mojo.
It does, but i still saw little reason to upgrade for my portable setup back then. I'll probably give it another listen when it's time to go back to work and need a new portable setup, something easier to carry around than the Z1R.The Hugo 2 is indeed brighter. But with the “Mojo filter” it gets closer to the Mojo.
As a follow up i just realized my old cable wouldn't even handle 24/96, i usually have Tidal set to play Hi-fi, not master and avoid mqa tracks, but i accidentally left in on Master today and a mqa track came up it just cut sound and Tidal switched outputs to my gaming soundcard.Hope this helps you experiment with obtaining better sound using optical cables, without needing to spend the earth.