DBaldock9
Headphoneus Supremus
Please share impressions of the Asura. For the price, the Monks can't be beat - I especially love the balanced versions (though in fairness that may be because I listen to them primarily with an LH Labs GO V2 Infinity, and the balanced output is rumored to be much better than the SE). I've been unable to pull the trigger on the higher end VE models........ though for the amount of money I've spent collecting the different colors, I probably could have bought one of their higher-end models!
The standard Monk Plus (SE 3.5TRS) that I received, already has a new home with a co-worker. When I was comparing it to the Espresso Monk Plus (Balanced 2.5TRRS - connected to the 3.5mm TRS to 2.5mm TRRS Adapter cable), the differences were very subtle, but the Espresso model seemed to have a slightly more open sound stage. It just didn't seem like the overall sound of the Monk Plus is affected too much by the difference in cables, when connected to the Single-Ended output. The Espresso 2.5TRRS does sound better when it's connected to the Balanced output of my DP-X1, with better Bass (clarity & impact), and larger sound-stage.
Comparing the Balanced models of the Asura 2.0 and the Monk Plus (both with the Black/White donut foams) - the Monk Plus seems to have more Low Bass, but the Asura has better clarity and detail in the Bass; clearer, more forward Midrange; and I just don't hear much difference in the Treble between the two.
NOTE: Since the Ausra 2.0 is 150Ω, and the Monk Plus is 64Ω, I did have to fiddle with the volume control a bit, to try and gain match - so that could influence my perceptions of which sounds clearer / better.
I guess the end result of this quick comparison, is that I believe the additional clarity & detail of the sound from the Asura 2.0 (Balanced 2.5TRRS), is worth the additional cost over the Monk Plus.
However, I'm not entirely convinced that the upgrade from the standard Monk Plus, to the Espresso Monk Plus (Balanced 2.5TRRS), is worth the 6x price increase.