On Balanced Sound
Many reviewers and head-fiers use the term "balanced" sound signature. But similar to the shape of the FR curve (U-, V-, W-; discussion here:
https://goo.gl/8wPg4q) the term is used inconsistently, which causes confusion.
First, how is
"balanced" used - since it is nowhere defined:
1. One writer claims that there are
two kinds of "balanced" sound". It refers to "
flat" or
"neutral" (same) with no frequency emphasized. Balanced sound can also refer to a
V-shaped sound (human ears are more sensitive to midrange, therefore some of usprefer boosted bass and treble; the latter is also called
"fun" signature.
2. Some writers consider only
V-shaped sound as
balanced, whereas others distinguish between the two terms (balanced and V-shape are different signatures).
3. To me, none of the above applies: balanced to me means
round, even, and harmonic sounding (the pierce in the ZS6 makes this one
unbalanced sounding).
I once again consulted HifiChris for discussion.
Our conclusions:
1. We both try to avoid
wishy-washy terms, therefore we don't like the term
"balanced".
2.
"Balanced" is a tuning above neutral that sounds
realistic and natural, it constitutes
a mild V-shape not far away from neutral.
3. We therefore disagree with point 1. above.
4. A
detailed description of the sound and the frequency response is more accurate and conclusive than a crude, poorly defined and therefore ambiguous term such as
"balanced".
Hmm...but how does
"mid-centric" fit in here? Another vague term: a close to
neutral tuning with a focus on mids.