I've monitored first audition impressions of independent users on Chinese erji forum.
I found only 4, relating to sonic qualities.
1 User ljwllll: "The sound much more better then had engeneering sample."
2 User Buy or not X7: "Background noise persists, with 846, 3003 heard obviously."
3 User 摆直一头龟: "Generally compare sound with QLC, especially modded, QLC feels better"
4 User Okcomputer: "Speaking about i5 sound- this is very familiar voice, i5 and my 6420 notebook sound very, very similar to my hearing, their similarity over 90%"
I worried about this, then they said, that planned to use AD712 instead LME49720.
AD712 itself has quite high level of own noise ( compare with modern audio OPAMP). That in some cases may cause degradation of sound.
We understand your have doubt regarding the AD712 since your first post, a number of members has voiced different opinions but appearance there is no way we can shake what you BELIEVE. I'll interested to discuss the issue of AD712 vs LME49720 if we are in a DIY forum, but when we are discussing about commercial DAP products, I do not want to exaggerate the implication of a single component. If i have to pick a component to make noise with, I probably will pick the DAC chipset which is far more significant then the LPF. The fact is not all ESS9018 DAC sounds the same, and an AK4490 based DAP can be more analytical that ES9018 based DAP, the important issue is the overall implementation, the compensation considerations, where you used it, how you used it, and the synergy in the circuit design. The specification of a single component is not the determining factor IMHO, I believe the final product is all that matters eventually.
I seldom share my own impression after I joined Cayin, used to do that before I become member of Trade. For the record, I'll state my own observation but I have to remind everyone I have personal interest with the gears involved. I have compared the production version i5 vs my display sample from Munich Show briefly, only briefly but fortunately that is side by side A-B-A comparison with the same songs and same IEM. I can hear the different, but they are not significant, and definitely not a downgrade in audio performance. I do not hear any hissing/background noise with my IEM during the comparison, I used Unique Melody
Martian 2+2 (28ohm, 110dB). In fact I didn't hear any background noise even with the previous version of i5 during regular playback, the background noise problem was related to WiFi function only, the new version has significantly rectified the WiFi problem. If you look for it with some special technique, you can still hear the WiFi interference, but most user feedback confirmed that they don't have any problem using i5 for online music playback now.
Regarding the four single line translation from erji forum, I want to remind readers that the audio discussion forum has a very different culture and ecosystem from HeadFi, taking one line out of an article is very dangerous, let alone ignoring the on-going discussion before and after the post. This can easily result in taking a quote out of context completely.
I happened to read all these discussion previously, I'll try to describe the "context" of (2) and (4) so that reader can visualize the statements better.
2 User Buy or not X7: "Background noise persists, with 846, 3003 heard obviously."
Original link: http://www.erji.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1919125&page=2#pid29305496
User " Buy or not X7" has make 8 posts in this thread. In short, he is in the middle of dispute against Cayin in the discussion. He challenged the power on and power off timing of i5 as well as the attitude of Cayin Support service. when Cayin posted a video to record the time required to turn on and off the DAP, he don't accept that and accused Cayin as possibly making up false evident to "beautify" their products and cannot be trusted. The statements quoted here in the fourth posts he wrote in the thread. Regarding the background noise issue, he didn't described the testing condition. It is uncertain whether that is background noise from regular playback or interference of WiFi. There in no information regarding the gain and volume setting when these highly sensitive IEMs were used, or whether he heard the noise in the middle of music playback, or during the gap between songs, or literally pause the playback and then turn up the volume to expose background noise at abnormal condition (you'll be surprised that similar outrageous practice to examine background noise is not uncommon in erji forum)
4 User Okcomputer: "Speaking about i5 sound- this is very familiar voice, i5 and my 6420 notebook sound very, very similar to my hearing, their similarity over 90%"
Original link: http://www.erji.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1928589&highlight=
While that is the true meaning of what Okcomputer has said in his impression of Cayin i5, one must be aware that this user truly believed and boldly claimed that Chinese DAP are inferior to notebook computer (
国砖干不过笔记本电脑). In his previous HOT discussion (over 150 posts) on this notebook computer topic, he stated that he has compared HiFiman hm650, Soundaware m1pro, QLS qa360mod, HiFiman supermini, L&P L5Pro, Hifiman 802S, Fiio X7+AM2, none of them is as good as the headphone out of his Dell 6420 notebook computer, and he only used
AKG Y15 and Y16 for all his audition/comparison.
He has also stated that he has compared Fiio X7 and Cayin N5, while the X7 exhibits higher quality in every ways, he prefers Cayin N5 as he can feel the passion and emotion of music better with N5. Because of this positive experience with N5, he go for the Cayin i5 and he described i5 as "relieve his concern on audio of Android system, based on the audio performance (of i5) and the user-friendly Android, expandability and continuous development of hardware and software, he is convinced that Android DAP will rule in Chinese DAP market". So in his opinion, when he said Cayin i5 is 90% of his Dell 6420, he consider i5 that as a rave and Cayin i5 is a very good DAP.
I hope the additional information will help readers to understand bratella's quotations.