WindyCityCy
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2003
- Posts
- 303
- Likes
- 19
I just got these ordered directly from B&W 3 days ago. Seem to have the updated firmware.
5 working days but alas audio sanctuary sold out again on friday.That's what I got from a quick search, was hoping that this was available at some places already. Thanks guys!
How long did it take to ship from UK to Aus? Hoping to get this pair before I travel in early December.
I'm also thinking of switching from a B&O H7 to this, anyone here have experience with both?
No GST which is awesome.. how you finding them?
Hey guys looking for a great wireless headphone. Has anyone tried the problem with the iPhone X?
What I noticed is an extended bluetooth range. Probably because of BT v5 adopted in iPhone XHey guys looking for a great wireless headphone. Has anyone tried the problem with the iPhone X?
The day after: sound quality now is amazing. More open, more room, bigger sound stage. I tried several apps on my iPhone 7: YouTube, Apple Music, radio apps, etc. and they sound all nice! During work I listen a lot of light classic music from Classic FM and I really like what I hear with the PXAfter burn in this afternoon the PX opened more. So sound quality is now "OK".
Fascinating, they've increased the kbps with around 60 percent using the new format. Reading up, it is indeed lossy.False, APTX HD will process 24/48 vs APTX's 16/48 but that's about it. It is still lossy in it's current operation. With the advance of BT 5.0 however this could change as the technology matures.
Here is a good article about the current affair of Aptx HD.
https://www.androidauthority.com/aptx-hd-audio-codec-explained-789342/
And Sony LDAC is even better than Aptx HDFascinating, they've increased the kbps with around 60 percent using the new format. Reading up, it is indeed lossy.
Qualcomm have some answers to the claim ''indistinguishable from high resolution audio", http://www.avhub.com.au/news/sound-image/aptx-hd---lossless-or-lossy-442124
We contacted Qualcomm with questions, and our thanks to Jonny McClintock, director of aptX Sales and Marketing at Qualcomm, for providing the following answers.
S+I: Can you confirm whether aptX HD is a lossless or lossy codec?
JM: The aptX HD is technically a Lossy codec. However as aptX HD uses a relatively gentle compression ratio of 4:1 it is non-destructive in nature. As it is based on ADPCM and not psycho-acoustic perceptual based principles, aptX HD uses predictive analysis rather than attempting to replicate the performance of the human hearing via a synthetic ear.
I have some sony cans with lac its a 24/96 codec where aptxhd is 24/48. Ldac sounds very very good in my opinion.And Sony LDAC is even better than Aptx HD
Why these questions never asked directly from the engineers and not the S&M guys? I any case,Fascinating, they've increased the kbps with around 60 percent using the new format. Reading up, it is indeed lossy.
Qualcomm have some answers to the claim ''indistinguishable from high resolution audio", http://www.avhub.com.au/news/sound-image/aptx-hd---lossless-or-lossy-442124
We contacted Qualcomm with questions, and our thanks to Jonny McClintock, director of aptX Sales and Marketing at Qualcomm, for providing the following answers.
S+I: Can you confirm whether aptX HD is a lossless or lossy codec?
JM: The aptX HD is technically a Lossy codec. However as aptX HD uses a relatively gentle compression ratio of 4:1 it is non-destructive in nature. As it is based on ADPCM and not psycho-acoustic perceptual based principles, aptX HD uses predictive analysis rather than attempting to replicate the performance of the human hearing via a synthetic ear.
will share one later when I can (at work right now ). Initially I thought it was too small, but no its just "snug". Could be made for it.
Can you share a picture?