Either my english sucks and I have another interpretation of some words like "fuller" and "detailed" - or my ears are so far away from the rest of the world. I appreciate what you hear and acknowledge how your describe these two. I only have to say my impression of T5p vs. T70 is the direct opposite of what you write. OK

Why is it that we interpret the sound this way? I anticipate that it is me who hear differently... so please help me here..
There is a more present low end in the T5p than in the T70, can we agree on that? - for me this means that the T5p is certainly better for gaming than the T70. The T70 are thin in comparison to the T5p and not fuller? The T70 are more airy where the T5p has more meat and body to it's sound.
Could it be, that when I have the impression that T70 has more mids, my brain is being cheated by the lesser low end in T70 and this makes me register the mids much more? I am searching for a reason why I am so wrong, so please help
When I first heard the T5p I felt that the mids were lacking. By saying that the T70 is fuller - and that it has less mids is to me a contradiction, by how I understand those words. To my ears the T70 is definitely mid-focused and the mids and treble gives an impression of very high resolution. How about Etymotic ER-4S - would you say they are full and do the mids come forward on those?
Thanks for your patience with me -