IpodPJ, have you seen this?
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f21/bl...esults-190566/
The members here had a tough time telling the difference between cables. Testing conditions weren't rigorous; people were allowed to use them in their systems as they saw fit and had plenty of time to listen.
Even then, the results were about the same as random guessing. I know of no other test where people have been able to tell the difference between cables. This controversy has been brewing for a good 20 years and still, no one has been able to pass a test.
Say what you want about blind testing, but if the results are "obvious" and "night and day," then the people who hear that should still be able to without seeing the cable. The claim is that the sound different, not that a cable looks different. A visible logo shouldn't change anything, right?
Also consider that excellent test tools have been available for a good 50 years. As far as I know, no manufacturer has actually
tested their cables and shown the difference between their product and the competition. Look at cable ads: 100% testimonials and soft claims. Nothing that can be actually proven.
Very, very curious. How come all other products, from cars to washing machines, from concrete to steel, are qualitatively measured and tested? Why are amps and speakers tested, but cables are not?
What would the benefits of testing be? If you could show your product to be better than the competition, then you would have a marketing and sales advantage. Why don't cable companies do this? It's not a secret. Ask the salesman at your car dealer. He'll tell you how his cars stack up against the competition, and with hard numbers. Ask the admissions department at a university. They will give you hard figures about admissions and everything you would want to know about the school.
Another industry that hides behind soft claims and testimonials is quack medicine. Do you really think a magic herbal pill will cure cancer, as well? Do you believe in testing pharmaceuticals?