While I'm a fan of the Nightowls, especially at their current 2nd hand price, they're not a match for LCD2s and burn in isn't gonna change anything. Your brain might adjust some with more listening, I think they do have their strong points. The Nighthawks are even further away, definitely an acquired taste and the weirder of the audioquest headphones.
After a respectable quantity of phones beeing here on visit I reached my goal after 3 years of searching for the the one and only: AQ Nighthawk with hm5 pads and a tiny bit of dampening with 2 tin layers of teafilter.
All others are sold, really good ones and in some aspects clear better as the hawks. I really was enjoing some great cans to listen for a while.
But this is the only HP for me that draws me right into the music immediately. The only phone for me till now that offers longtime fatigue-free listening, the only one which relaxes me the most listening music even that much that I fall asleep sometime even on louder levels ... best sign that I feel completely pleasent and relaxed.
This AQs are really unique in all aspects. The whole construction and very low weight makes them to the most comfortable ones I had on my head.
At the moment they are powered with Shiit Magny Heresy / Topping D10.
For me the Hawks, Owls and the Sony MDR-Z7 (MK1) do music the way I like the most, from lo-fi indie music to well recorded classical music. I like sound to be on the warmer and lusher side (or thicker side if you will) of neutral. I honestly have no need for more details, bigger soundstage or better clarity. There are only a few pairs of headphones I am still curious about: the ZMF Atticus, Aeolus and maybe the Auteur, but they cost too much to really consider. In a thread the Denon D7200s were compared to the ZMF Eikons and according to Purr1n the D7200s come very close to the Eikons, "I'd probably pick the Eikons by a hair" The D7200s can be bought for around 500 euro, so maybe I could reconsider trying them again?
I have had a pair of nighthawk carbons for a few days. They are used but look like they have not had much use. When I first put them on they sound muddy. After a while they get clearer. Any idea why this is. Thanks.
I have had a pair of nighthawk carbons for a few days. They are used but look like they have not had much use. When I first put them on they sound muddy. After a while they get clearer. Any idea why this is. Thanks.
I have had a pair of nighthawk carbons for a few days. They are used but look like they have not had much use. When I first put them on they sound muddy. After a while they get clearer. Any idea why this is. Thanks.
played them yesterday they sounded clear from the start. Let them burn in 10 hours today. Started off muddy then got slowly clearer when I used them this evening.
Just a thought. I use a grado extension cable. Will this be good enough with these headphones. My headphone amp is a Graham Slee Solo. I have noticed I don’t have to use as much volume as when I use other headphones.
I have had a pair of nighthawk carbons for a few days. They are used but look like they have not had much use. When I first put them on they sound muddy. After a while they get clearer. Any idea why this is. Thanks.
You're probably used to brighter sound signatures. Your brain got used to what you are hearing from Nighthawk, and you adjusted and were able to notice the detail and nuance without the boosted signals.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.