whitemouse
100+ Head-Fier
I upgraded from the iSine 20 to the i4 and the i4 from the first 20 second of listening was a noticeable an IMHO big step up in just about every way in terms of sound. I posted my comparison impressions several times in their thread, but there is more bass and treble extension, texture, and detail; more transparent, holographic sound; more detail; the i4 scales better the better sources you use; the i4 is airier and more open sounding; there is better instrument separation and placement; etc. It seems that to the majority of others (at least in this forum) who have heard both, the i4 is a noticeable step up. Others have asked how much of a step up, and I’m not going to try to quantify it
/snip/
I will also say that while I found that the iSine 20s benefitted hugely from EQ, I was very happy with the i4s sound without any eq at all. I have listened extensively to Tidal via roon fed into a Hugo2 and then the i4 both with and without the Audeze i4 eq preset and the difference to my ears between eq and no eq, while there, is pretty subtle
Thank you!
Opinion of someone moving from isine 20 to LCD i4 impressions is everything I was hoping for. Thank you for taking the time!
Advice along the lines of 'look harder', in order to audition LCD i4 are of no value. Audio boutiques do not stock Audeze's custom made, special order ear gear. MungkongGadget does have LCD - 4 in stock, usually, but not every time, I pop in to their Amarin Plaza flagship shore once a week to listen to Stax, Audeze LCD - 4 are usually available, not once have they had LCDi4 for auditioning.
Thank you, sorrick, I did read your earlier posts in this thread, somehow I missed them before.
You are right, it is impossible to put a numeric value on how much i4 are better than isine 20.
Incremental differences in audio quality are subjective to begin with, for many people LCD2 are all they need, they don't consider LCD 3's price worth spending over 'minor' improvement. But to others the LCD 3 are completely different animal, and after hearing the 3, there's no going back to LCD 2, other than keeping them as back up.
Probably same applies to LCD i4. Once you listened to them, you won't accept anything less.
Seems I will place an order for i4.
One nagging thing - Audeze replied, and they do not offer i4 without the $400 wondercable.
So I'm going to have to drop $400 for something that I have zero use for. Things like this keep me awake at night, nagging feeling that I just threw away $400. Seems unfair. And dumb. The cable isnti attached. It is completely separate item in Audeze catalogue, yet it's tied to LCD i4 as a mandatory item, and expense. Why?
For years Audeze was commended for resisting participating in the cable game. Sure, LCD 2 and 3 cables were badly built, and for $5 more Audeze could have ordered a cable with slightly thicker rubber sleeve from Chinese cable manufacturer, instead they opted for thinnest cable, cables that failed very quickly at XLR Mini stress points. Audeze gave up when they released LCD 4, a thick, blue cable made appearance. Sure, they watched, as cable 'manufacturers' made nice profits offering expensive cables for their LCD line.
At cable games, Audeze is now all in with their $400 i4 cable. Good for them! But potential i4 buyer should be able to opt out, and use newly ourchased LCD i4 with his/hers own $15 cable, which is just as good as the $400 cable, or a $4000 cable for that matter.
But my mind is made up, I'm going to buy LCD i4, minus the $400 cable! There are few around at 2000€, but not from Audeze.