Yes it is 1060 and I think the foam is Pelican pick a foam 1062 that is what I used. You pick and pluck till you get what you want. The foam can be plucked, small blocks at a time.
@OrpheusIV I also made a slot in the middle of the foam on the side touching Hugo2, this made it easy to stick a finger in and lift the Hugo2 up.
Yes it is 1060 and I think the foam is Pelican pick a foam 1062 that is what I used. You pick and pluck till you get what you want. The foam can be plucked, small blocks at a time.
@OrpheusIV I also made a slot in the middle of the foam on the side touching Hugo2, this made it easy to stick a finger in and lift the Hugo2 up.
I've been monitoring this thread and can't recall if this was directly addressed.
How analytical are the i4's? I'm debating Hugo TT vs Hugo 2 for them and if they are analytical than the Hugo 2 would be too transparent for my taste probably.
I've been monitoring this thread and can't recall if this was directly addressed.
How analytical are the i4's? I'm debating Hugo TT vs Hugo 2 for them and if they are analytical than the Hugo 2 would be too transparent for my taste probably.
Certainly not "analytical. They have that Audeze LCD-4 magic in a much smaller and lighter package! FWIW, I prefer them out of the Hugo 2...brilliant combination. The Hugo 2 has a bit more power and better synergy. The TT is a darker sounding DAC (darker than neutral to my ears) and thus my preference for the Hugo 2 with these in-ears.
Would there be a compelling reason to upgrade from a Mojo to a Hugo 2? For driving the i4 obviously... When I ordered the Mojo I did not even think about Hugo2.
Would there be a compelling reason to upgrade from a Mojo to a Hugo 2? For driving the i4 obviously... When I ordered the Mojo I did not even think about Hugo2.
¨
Maybe the LCDi4 with Mojo will be so much better than what you had before, that your wallet will get some time to fully recover before you take the next step at the never ending better sound ladder.
I love the Audeze house sound and have the LCD-X currently and am looking to upgrade, do you think the LCDi4 would outperform my LCD-X? And for that matter all other LCD editions (with the exception of the LCD-4), from what you have experienced so far? I am just trying to work out where they would sit in the Audeze LCD hierarchy and whether it's worth tracking down a pair to audition.
Yes I shall order the Hugo 2, I have read to many good reviews, impressions and recommendations....including your keen impressions. I want my i4's to sound the best they can, while mobile. But it also sounds like the Hugo 2 can be used as a desktop DACs and that is icing on the cake.
I love the Audeze house sound and have the LCD-X currently and am looking to upgrade, do you think the LCDi4 would outperform my LCD-X? And for that matter all other LCD editions (with the exception of the LCD-4), from what you have experienced so far? I am just trying to work out where they would sit in the Audeze LCD hierarchy and whether it's worth tracking down a pair to audition.
IMHO the i4 are better than the X in that they are just a tad bit warmer and the X tend toward perhaps a slightly more neutral presentation possibly. Not a strike against the X by any means but the form factor of the i4 which lends them to unequaled comfort compared to large heavy cans over the head sure sold me. As with a lot of feedback from audiophilia, kinda subjective...
I love the Audeze house sound and have the LCD-X currently and am looking to upgrade, do you think the LCDi4 would outperform my LCD-X? And for that matter all other LCD editions (with the exception of the LCD-4), from what you have experienced so far? I am just trying to work out where they would sit in the Audeze LCD hierarchy and whether it's worth tracking down a pair to audition.
I prefer the sound of the i4 over the LCD-XC and the LCD-2.2. They're better technically as well to my ears. I would whole heartily recommend giving them an audition, but make sure it isn't a noisy environment as they don't isolate.
As a recent convert to the world of EQ, I'll also add that one of the many beauties of the i4's is their ability to take EQ so well enabling you to personalize the sound. I rarely listen to them without at least a little EQ. With other headphones/iem's I would only use EQ to fix a problem. With the i4's you have a blank canvas to work with. The stock sound is not bad, just not ideal for my preferences.
I love the Audeze house sound and have the LCD-X currently and am looking to upgrade, do you think the LCDi4 would outperform my LCD-X? And for that matter all other LCD editions (with the exception of the LCD-4), from what you have experienced so far? I am just trying to work out where they would sit in the Audeze LCD hierarchy and whether it's worth tracking down a pair to audition.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
