May 21, 2022 at 8:15 PM Post #5,251 of 7,074
I can completely accept that some people don't prefer that much energy up there though, as seen by the popularity of some of the other EQ presets out there that lower the peak to smooth things out.
This will be the case if one person likes it and another says it's shouty if both are in the same spot listening to the same exact setup and location.

If you follow any CanJam thread, the impressions across many goers are unanimous compared to the devisiveness in a head-fi thread. Also, the same person trying the same headphone on different booths says it sounds different. If someone sets up the EQ on a setup that's on booth A, that EQ won't sound good or won't apply on booth B. So again, one is better off tuning to Harman, but not by ear but by instrumentation, then work their way improving the rest of the chain until that sounds good. I found the Hugo 2 shouty for years and turns out it's because I was using a laptop/pc and usb in, which is similar to Benno's setup. But see, if I didn't know any better, I would say it was my LCD 3 and LCD4 that was shouty in the chain with the laptop + Hugo 2.
 
May 21, 2022 at 8:44 PM Post #5,252 of 7,074
Also take into consideration Head-Fi attracts a certain listener, and has a almost group bias toward aspects that we believe to be true. If you took the mean impression of a certain thing, I'd think Head-Fi would differ from SBAF, Headphones.com, ASR etc.

Only ever comes down to the individual, their ears, brain, chain.

I'm content for the time being. Have been up and down the ladder with all gear, DACs and Amps costing more and less. Way too many headphones. Process of finding elements that align with your preferences.
 
Last edited:
May 21, 2022 at 8:54 PM Post #5,253 of 7,074
Also take into consideration Head-Fi attracts a certain listener, and has a almost group bias toward aspects that we believe to be true. If you took the mean impression of a certain thing, I'd think Head-Fi would differ from SBAF, Headphones.com, ASR etc.

Only ever comes down to the individual, their ears, brain, chain.

I'm content for the time being. Have been up and down the ladder with all gear, DACs and Amps costing more and less. Way too many headphones. Process of finding elements that align with your preferences.

So, the convolver is needed along with the filters?

What would you say is different compared to all the other peq's so far?
 
May 21, 2022 at 9:00 PM Post #5,254 of 7,074
So, the convolver is needed along with the filters?

What would you say is different compared to all the other peq's so far?
No. Just the filter. Its a .wav file. Equalizer APO or Roon can load it.

Effortless balance I'd say. If had to sum it up quickly. I like it. Has less 3-4k than a lot of people's EQs do. Check his article I linked, gives you an idea. His graphs aren't compensated like most do keep in mind.
 
May 21, 2022 at 9:04 PM Post #5,255 of 7,074
No. Just the filter. Its a .wav file. Equalizer APO or Roon can load it.

Effortless balance I'd say. If had to sum it up quickly. I like it. Has less 3-4k than a lot of people's EQs do. Check his article I linked, gives you an idea. His graphs aren't compensated like most do keep in mind.
The shoutiness is from the PC + qutest setup, not the lcd5.
 
May 21, 2022 at 10:00 PM Post #5,258 of 7,074
Wrong.

I've tried more than PC to Qutest via USB homie. Actually prefer the TT2, unsure now why I sold it. Might buy it back.
Why even bother? Just block him. That's what the rest of us have done.
 
May 21, 2022 at 10:12 PM Post #5,261 of 7,074
If anyone else gets the filter I'd be keen to know your thoughts (though it won't change my thoughts haha)

I’m considering it. I need to make sure I can apply the FIR filter in HQP as I prefer to apply all DSP there rather than Roon. I’m fairly sure this is possible using HQP’s convolution engine. I’ll let you know if I end up doing it.
 
May 21, 2022 at 11:07 PM Post #5,262 of 7,074
This will be the case if one person likes it and another says it's shouty if both are in the same spot listening to the same exact setup and location.

If you follow any CanJam thread, the impressions across many goers are unanimous compared to the devisiveness in a head-fi thread. Also, the same person trying the same headphone on different booths says it sounds different. If someone sets up the EQ on a setup that's on booth A, that EQ won't sound good or won't apply on booth B. So again, one is better off tuning to Harman, but not by ear but by instrumentation, then work their way improving the rest of the chain until that sounds good. I found the Hugo 2 shouty for years and turns out it's because I was using a laptop/pc and usb in, which is similar to Benno's setup. But see, if I didn't know any better, I would say it was my LCD 3 and LCD4 that was shouty in the chain with the laptop + Hugo 2.
I’m personally of the belief that the difference between amps and DACs tends to be extremely minor, at least when talking about delta sigma and solid state. It sure if anyone was demoing the LCD-5 at canjam on R2R and tube setups.
 
May 21, 2022 at 11:20 PM Post #5,263 of 7,074
go figure, I think the differences between dac's and amps is huge
 
May 22, 2022 at 12:09 AM Post #5,264 of 7,074
I’m personally of the belief that the difference between amps and DACs tends to be extremely minor...
Absolutely right.
There have been many blind tests decades ago, that have shown that DACs and amplifiers do not have an "inherent sound".
Provided they work as they should, and are not intentionally sounded (not linear FR, or not current stable to the load).

In blind tests, participants are not able to hear the difference between DACs or amps.
Not even the difference between THD 0.05 and 0.5%.

At this point, I would like to emphasize once again that I wish things were different...
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

  • PrTv
Back
Top