+1
I found that having heard bass done correctly finally added a new dimension to my listening experiences, and there is no going back. My opinion is that subsonic frequencies serve as a foundation to correctly prop up the rest of the music.
I have since sold off my speaker subwoofer which was extremely wooly in the subbass, and using the LCD2 as a reference, my next big investment is for a super duper subwoofer that can go as linear and as low as possible with as much control as possible, to mate with my budget Tannoy bookshelf speakers - which to my ears, have a quicker transient response than most mid and entry level headphones. Even then I don't expect the integration of the bass, and control to be as good as the LCD2s, then there is a problem with room resonances and bass interactions...the last two reason is the reason I have never heard acceptable bass from speakers, never heard a speaker that can integrate bass better than even my humble HD650. Let alone the integration, linearity, extension and quality control of my LCD2s.
I still think that its the quality bass and seamless midrange integration that gives my LCD2s that perfect vocal harmony. The biggest complaint I have with the LCD2s, and I'm not really sure one can lay the blame fairly on the LCD2s, is that some recordings are already very bassy and dark, such as R&B. I tend to prefer bass light headphones for bass heavy music, the opposite behaviour to bass-heads.
I also had the K1000 with me for a couple of months to evaluate, and came to an easy conclusion that software crossfeed can give the K1000 soundstage advantage to any headphone. Some recordings plainly demand it.
Also, happy Easter break to all.