PS. ...only the CRBN that convinces me
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/aud...iew-measurements.958938/page-53#post-16647708
I am curious how the first impressions will last after 3-6 months, both with the X9K and CRBN. I know some people already got second thoughts with both, after a blooming first love. It happens with headphones and many other things.
While I liked the X9K at first listening, and I could also tell I could not improve much on their sound with ear pad mods (I won't even try), since the change direction I usually get would work against them. I can imagine what might have caused some disillusion with them: they show all roughness in the audio chain and it takes the best components to "clap together" into the fluid musical experience they are capable of, much more than any modern Stax models (the SR-Omega, SR-Lambda, 007 Mk1 still stand the test of time).
Now I have not heard the CRBN yet, but by your description of the hard memory foam pads and looking at them, my experience with many e-stats and dynamic headphones whispers to me that one might be able to seriously improve the CRBN by using thinner pads (I would estimate about 50% less thickness in the front and 30-50% in the back), even with the same foam, but possibly there are better "sounding" foams as well (hard to say without seeing/hearing them first). I am sure Audeze has put some effort in this, so this is just a hunch.
But it's good they departed from the "Audeze sound" and it's good it has depth. I feel a lot of potential in the CRBN. Eagerly waiting for the CRBN 2 and 3.
Last edited: