AKG's new K872?
Nov 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM Post #226 of 642
How do they sound compared to the ether c and ether flow ?


Bigger soundstage, a bit smoother treble, a bit more bass (while still being a bit bass light), and a more magical musical overall feel than Ether C. I haven't heard the Flow yet.
 
Nov 2, 2016 at 7:13 AM Post #227 of 642
Bigger soundstage, a bit smoother treble, a bit more bass (while still being a bit bass light), and a more magical musical overall feel than Ether C. I haven't heard the Flow yet.

 
If it has more bass than the K812, that would be fine for me, I'd rather go with better musicality, so it's still a contender it seems, especially if it beats the Ether C on that account. What about sound stage width, height, depth, imaging?
 
Nov 2, 2016 at 8:05 AM Post #228 of 642
Nov 4, 2016 at 7:48 AM Post #230 of 642
   
If it has more bass than the K812, that would be fine for me, I'd rather go with better musicality, 

 
my experience:
K872 have more bass than K812 - and
K872 sounds more 'musicality' 
 
But I don't have an Ether C to compare both.
 
K872 offers more relaxed enjoyment of music. 
The K812 ist the Swiss Army Knife for sound engineers and offers each peace of cake of blotchiness in the music stream.
 
Nov 4, 2016 at 9:06 AM Post #231 of 642
 

If it has more bass than the K812, that would be fine for me, I'd rather go with better musicality, 


my experience:
K872 have more bass than K812 - and
K872 sounds more 'musicality' 

But I don't have an Ether C to compare both.

K872 offers more relaxed enjoyment of music. 
The K812 ist the Swiss Army Knife for sound engineers and offers each peace of cake of blotchiness in the music stream.


I find the K872 completely useless for sound engineering because of the rolled off bass. It was tuned for audiophiles to compete with other high end headphones
 
Nov 4, 2016 at 9:59 AM Post #232 of 642
I find the K872 completely useless for sound engineering because of the rolled off bass. It was tuned for audiophiles to compete with other high end headphones

They tuned the K872 to have the rolled off bass, because audiophiles like it? I wonder what sound engineers did back then when all headphones had the rolled off bass and they all were "completely useless". 
 
Nov 4, 2016 at 10:31 AM Post #233 of 642
For decades now it's been common knowledge that you can't mix with headphones.

K872 has rolled off bass not just because " audiophiles like it" but because rolled off bass expands the soundstage and spotlights treble and mid detail, which makes the headphone sound more expensive. This is almost mandatory if you want to charge $1000+ for headphone. Either roll off the bass or boost the treble. A lot of times both are incorporated.

So roll off the bass in your tuning and it sounds more detailed with a better soundstage.

Many of us have been guided in the direction of rolled off bass that removes bass bloat. However, if that bass bloat is in the recording and the headphone removes it, as a professional engineer I look upon that as missing data.

I have a database of headphones recorded through a binaural microphone that I built and I compare each with the original recording for accuracy:

 
Nov 4, 2016 at 11:04 AM Post #236 of 642
For decades now it's been common knowledge that you can't mix with headphones.

K872 has rolled off bass not just because " audiophiles like it" but because rolled off bass expands the soundstage and spotlights treble and mid detail, which makes the headphone sound more expensive. This is almost mandatory if you want to charge $1000+ for headphone. Either roll off the bass or boost the treble. A lot of times both are incorporated.

So roll off the bass in your tuning and it sounds more detailed with a better soundstage.

Many of us have been guided in the direction of rolled off bass that removes bass bloat. However, if that bass bloat is in the recording and the headphone removes it, as a professional engineer I look upon that as missing data.

I have a database of headphones recorded through a binaural microphone that I built and I compare each with the original recording for accuracy:


Interesting to hear your perspective as a sound engineer. Is there a way we can hear the recordings of each headphone?
 
Nov 4, 2016 at 11:37 AM Post #237 of 642
  Interesting to hear your perspective as a sound engineer. Is there a way we can hear the recordings of each headphone?

 
 I've pm'd you a link of 3 headphones+the original recording. i'm not at home so they're not level matched, but I'm pretty sure you'll hear the differences between each headphone. I haven't released them publicly because of obvious copyright issues that i don't want to deal with. Of course a simple solution is to re-record everything with my own music, but I'm not sure I want to submit my music for critique/criticism.
 
The headphones are Focal Utopia, Beats 1.0, and K872. I actually used those examples to prove that my Focal utopia was defective, because the bass was breaking up.
 
Nov 4, 2016 at 11:46 AM Post #238 of 642
   
 I've pm'd you a link of 3 headphones+the original recording. i'm not at home so they're not level matched, but I'm pretty sure you'll hear the differences between each headphone. I haven't released them publicly because of obvious copyright issues that i don't want to deal with. Of course a simple solution is to re-record everything with my own music, but I'm not sure I want to submit my music for critique/criticism.
 
The headphones are Focal Utopia, Beats 1.0, and K872. I actually used those examples to prove that my Focal utopia was defective, because the bass was breaking up.

Wow I think I can tell I will really like the k872/k812. I just don't really know how the soundstage is because I'm using the hd800s to listen to them. The utopia was on a different level and sounded great even for a defective model, it was getting to the point where it didn't sound like a headphone recording, but I don't know how the original of that song sounds like. Thanks for the samples
 
Nov 4, 2016 at 11:49 AM Post #239 of 642
The original recording was included so you can directly compare them. The main goal of my testing is frequency response. Soundstage is not really the focus but you can get a rough idea of things like clarity and soundstage.
 
*edit*
 
I recommend that you always compare the headphone to the original audio file for reference of how accurate it is; of course you still can compare each headphone to another to see which one is more enjoyable
 
Nov 4, 2016 at 11:52 AM Post #240 of 642
  The original recording was included so you can directly compare them. The main goal of my testing is frequency response. Soundstage is not really the focus but you can get a rough idea of things like clarity and soundstage.

The utopia had a different song from the rest but I can tell it is a superb headphone. 
regular_smile .gif

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top