Coolsax
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
- Posts
- 73
- Likes
- 11
Quote:
I almost never listen to the AD700 anymore that I have. It's a fine headphone for the price and definitely has quite a lot of detail for being so cheap! From what I remember, the AD700 definitely has more treble than the K601. The mids are also more forward on the K601 for sure and will be better for male/female vocals. There is a mild recession of the mids on the AD700, but it's not too bad at all. The AD700 makes the K601 look like a bass monster! Ok, that's overkill, but there is definitely a lot more bass. I still would never ever suggest the K601 for any genre that required quite a lot of bass. To me, the AD700 didn't have enough bass for me, but the K601 does. I think any less and I couldn't tolerate it.
K601 is definitely far better to me. The K702 more closely resembles the AD700's signature though I think. For those that want something a little more relaxed than the K702, the K601 would be a good option.
AD700 might actually have more detail than the HD-598 and K601. It seems to me price doesn't always equal more detail. I'd have to compare them though. I just remember the AD700 being super detailed for such a low price.
The K601 is definitely far more balanced to me than the AD700.
that is good to hear. while I don't mind the Treble of the AD700, I wouldn't mind if its tamed a little bit. I have noticed that slightly recessed mid on certain singers and songs and sometimes its irritating...hmmmm really sounds like something I could really enjoy for awhile.. thanks for comparing the two.