MuppetFace
A Special Snowflake
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2010
- Posts
- 8,092
- Likes
- 1,211
Quote:
I can't agree with that, What's the purpose of releasing headphones when you already have acclamed ones? Just to get something new? Refreshing the lines?
Yes. That's exactly the purpose. Sitting on your laurels only leads to stagnation instead of innovation. Take Stax for example. They could have simply stopped with the Omega II, but instead they went on to release the SR-009.
Most of people will buy one expensive headphone and keep it for years, it's not the smartphone market;
Actually, most people don't buy expensive headphones. We're in the minority as audiophiles. Headphones like the K1000 can now only be purchased well used, or occasionally N.O.S. in rare instances. The market for them is strictly used, and as such a) they become increasingly rare, b) prices get inflated due to that rarity, and c) eventually issues like driver failure leads to even more scarcity and wasted money. Don't believe me? It's been happening with the Sony R10. A truly beautiful headphone that is arguably a work of art, extremely expensive and difficult to come by, and when someone DOES buy one they risk ending up with a $5,000 paperweight once the drivers fail. Companies may not always support their older products, and even something as straight forward as replacing a headband assembly can become an impossibility due to parts no longer being supplied.
so as long as they keep the same quality sound and build on their current highend headphones, I do not get why they should work on new ones every year / two years.
Even some devoted AKG fans I know don't think the K701 is a step up from their previous offerings. It certainly can't hold a candle to a proper flagship like the K1000. By releasing a new flagship on par with the K1000, all of those issues associated with the used collector's market outlined above can be addressed.
Besides, having new high-end products on the market helps foster competition. I for one like having new headphones on the market to try, too. Right now AKG is one of the only "big names" in our hobby that HASN'T released a new flagship. With the Quincy Jones lines, their business strategy is obviously shifting toward targeting more of an average consumer base instead of audiophiles.
And for the K550 case, there must be a reason why it's that much delayed, I prefer having delayed headphones that comes with quality than rushed headphones which comes with defaults.
If AKG is using these delays to make the K550 as good as it can be, then great. I have a feeling it has more to do with business and corporate decisions, myself. Who knows? The point is AKG could stand to communicate to their consumer base more clearly. There have been no real announcements or dates given for quite some time.